|
|
|
Date; 18/04/2024
|
|
Email: Re_wired@ymail.com
|
|
Our Ref: one.
|
|
Your Ref: 01
|
|
Phone:
|
|
Address;
|
|
Mr.
Simon Paul Cordell
|
|
109
Burncroft Avenue
|
|
Enfield
|
|
London
|
|
En3
7jq
|
·
Response sent Via Email To:
·
Subject marked as belongs with
the attention for:
·
Requested Note:
·
INDEX OF EMAIL
Introduction.
|
|
To be used
KEY INFORMATION TO CONSIDER
BEFORE
WE ADDRESS OUR ISSUES!
TABLE OF CONTENTS
·
Key Information to
Consider.
·
Todays Dates Future
Issues of Concern: Suspension Pending Enquiry & the Company Directors
Disqualification Act 1986 And Failed Companies,
·
Opposing Bail in Criminal
Proceedings
·
Freezing
Orders
·
Settlement
Agreements [Clause 1]
·
Selling
Copyright in & after these Proceedings [Clause 2]
·
The Duty of Candour for Public Authorities
·
Health and Social Care
·
Memorandum and Articles
of Association of Enfield Homes Limited Weblink
·
Losses and Special Payments: @Moved@
·
Statutory Conspiracy: @Moved@
·
Criminal Liability: @Moved@
·
Making A Complaint:
·
Arranging A Meeting!
·
Companies Act 2006
Directors' Duties
·
A
Reference Towards the Time Limitation Act 1980
·
The
Now Claimant Request That the Following Bail Conditions Get Imposed at The
Minimal, Upon the Accused.
·
Courts Powers Imposing Bail Conditions
·
A Reference Towards the
Time Limitation Act 1980 @Moved@
·
Statutory Responsibilities
Code of Conduct and Code of Accountability @Moved@
·
Levels of seriousness @Moved@
·
Equality Act 2010 @Moved@
KEY INFORMATION TO CONSIDER
BEFORE
WE ADDRESS OUR ISSUES!
Key
Information to Consider:
1.
Conflicting
Issues: It is crucial to acknowledge and
handle any potential conflicts that may arise during the course of these
proceedings. These conflicts should be addressed promptly and effectively
to ensure a fair and just resolution.
2.
Alerting
Practical Solutions: We highly recommend being
proactive in identifying and implementing practical solutions to mitigate
any issues that may hinder the smooth progression of the case. By
addressing these solutions beforehand, we can streamline procedures and
improve efficiency.
3.
Adherence:
It is important for all parties involved to adhere to the agreed upon
guidelines and regulations throughout the case proceedings. This will
promote fairness, transparency, and a respectful exchange of ideas.
4.
Preemptive
Measures: Taking preemptive measures to
address any potential challenges or obstacles can significantly contribute
to the overall success of the case. By identifying and implementing these
measures in advance, we can minimize disruptions and enhance the overall efficacy
of the procedures.
5.
Continuous
Improvement: We should strive for continuous
improvement throughout the case proceedings. This involves consistently
reassessing our approaches, incorporating feedback, and making necessary
adjustments to enhance the process and achieve the desired outcomes.
6.
Please consider these key
points as we navigate through the upcoming issues. By acknowledging
potential conflicts, implementing practical solutions, adhering to
guidelines, taking preemptive measures, and striving for continuous
improvement, we can ensure a smooth and effective resolution to our case.
TODAYS DATES FUTURE
ISSUES OF CONCERN:
·
SUSPENSION PENDING ENQUIRY:
It has come to our
attention that certain employees of Enfield Council and its subsidiary companies have
engaged in misconduct within the workplace. In order to address these
concerns, it is imperative that the monitoring office promptly suspend
these employees pending investigations.
For the sake of
clarity and transparency, we have provided a temporary link where you can
access the relevant files pertaining to this matter:
v File Link Location
ό https://horrific-corruption-files.webhop.me/
Groups-of-Involved-People-List/
We wish to
highlight that this action, which we term "Suspension
Pending Enquiry," is in line with the provisions set
forth in the Company
Directors Disqualification Act 1986. Pursuant to this act, it is our duty
to issue suspension orders and accompanying charge sheets to the
individuals involved.
Our client, Mr. S.
P. Cordell, the claimant in this case, firmly requests that any Enfield Council employees
who we accuse of or are of who we require to attend court for criminal or
civil offenses, receive a "Suspension
Pending Enquiry," by the relevant authority pending the
court proceedings and/or any ongoing inquiry. This step is necessary due to
the severity of the claims made against these individuals.
By taking swift
action and suspending the employees in question, we can ensure a fair and
unbiased investigation into the allegations. Furthermore, once we prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that the Chief Executive directors and any other specific
staff of Enfield Council failed to exercise adequate skill
and care, at work and thereby jeopardized the interests of the company's
creditors, customers, shareholders, and the public, then the relevant
Authority must take the correct and appropriate actions to disqualification.
In accordance with
the provisions of the Company
Directors Disqualification Act 1986, we assert that
these individuals should face disqualification
from becoming a director of a company, directly or
indirectly, or being concerned or taking part in the promotion, formation,
or management of various company structures without permission from the
Court and these structures will include but are not limited to:
1/
Privilege of Limited Liability Companies.
2/
Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) Companies.
3/
General Partnerships Companies.
4/
Building Societies Companies.
5/
Incorporated Friendly Societies Companies.
6/
NHS Foundation Trusts Companies.
7/
Registered Societies Companies.
8/
Charitable Incorporated Organisations Companies.
9/
Further Education Bodies Companies.
10/ Protected Cell Companies.
It is essential
that any disqualification imposed be proportionate to the offense and not
exceed a maximum duration of 15 years.
We trust that Enfield Council
will give its due consideration to this matter and now take the appropriate
action to ensure a just and fair resolution to these proceedings.
OPPOSING BAIL IN CRIMINAL
PROCEEDINGS:
Our Request
for Stringent Bail Conditions!
It also comes to
our attention that certain defendants involved in criminal proceedings may
be eligible for bail under the Bail Act 1976. We are writing
to express our opposition to the granting of bail and to request the
imposition of stringent bail conditions, in line with the public interest
and the severity of the crimes.
We firmly believe
that it is in the best interests of justice and the safety of the victim,
Mr. S. P. Cordell, as well as the public, that the defendants remain
remanded in custody during the pending enquiry. The following are the
reasons that support our request for refusing bail:
1/
Non-Absconding: There is a significant risk that
the defendants may fail to turn up at their future court dates and abscond,
thereby undermining the proceedings.
2/
Severity of Offenses: The crimes charged against the
defendants carry substantial sentences, and there is a high probability
that they would be imposed if the defendants were found guilty. This
severity warrants careful consideration when determining bail.
3/
Time Between Appearances: Given the potentially lengthy
period between the first appearance and the eventual trial, granting bail
could risk the defendants committing further offenses or tampering with
witnesses.
4/ Reprisals and
Obstruction of Justice:
There is a concern that if granted bail, the defendants may attempt to
intimidate or obstruct witnesses or engage in activities that undermine the
course of justice.
If, against our
recommendation, the court decides to grant bail, we respectfully request
the imposition of the following stringent bail conditions upon the accused:
1/
Electronic Monitoring: The defendants should be required
to wear a monitoring device as a means of tracking their whereabouts.
2/
No Contact Order: The accused should be strictly
prohibited from contacting, directly or indirectly, any individual involved
in the criminal case, including communication via social media, phone,
text, or any other means.
3/
Reporting to Police: The defendants should be required
to report to a designated police station at specified times, ensuring their
presence is consistently monitored.
4/
Restriction from Certain Areas: The accused should be prohibited
from entering certain areas associated with the case to prevent potential
interference or disruption.
5/
Surrender of Travel Documents: The defendants should be obliged to
surrender all of their travel documents, including passports, to the police
to restrict their ability to flee the jurisdiction.
6/
Surety Requirement: Surety, preferably a trusted
relative or friend, should be mandated to provide the Court with a
specified amount of money as a guarantee that the defendants will appear or
be forfeited should they fail to do so.
7/ Attendance in Bail
Support Programs:
The defendants should be required to participate actively in bail support
and supervision programs such as Intensive Supervision and Surveillance
(ISS) to ensure compliance with bail conditions.
We also wish to
draw your attention to the Powers of the Court under the Policing and Crime
Act 2017, specifically section (D. a). We urge you to oversee and
enforce the condition that mandates the surrender of all travel documents or documents of a
similar kind to prevent the defendants from evading legal obligations.
We trust that Enfield Council
will consider these requests seriously and take appropriate action to
safeguard the interests of justice and protect the rights of the victim and
the public.
FREEZING ORDERS
At the request of Mr. S. P. Cordell,
the Claimant in this matter, we strongly urge the Court to consider the
granting of an interim injunction order to freeze all personal assets of
the defendants. This is necessary in order to prevent the defendants from
dissipating their assets during the criminal or civil litigation
proceedings and to ensure that funds are available for potential recovery
of costs in the future.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS [Clause 1]
The Claimant and his Support Network
propose the possibility of an out-of-court settlement in these proceedings.
Such a settlement would be in the form of a legally binding document, based
on mutually agreed terms. Under this arrangement, the Claimant, Mr. S. P.
Cordell, would waive his right to bring a financial claim against Enfield Council
and its subsidiary companies, and in return, Enfield
Council and its
subsidiary companies would provide a more than reasonable financial payment
to the Claimant. All parties involved would voluntarily enter into this
agreement through a negotiation process.
SELLING COPYRIGHT IN & AFTER
THESE PROCEEDINGS [Clause 2]
The Claimant asserts his legal right
to the copyright of these materials and would be open to selling his
copyright if the defendants agree to an out-of-court settlement. It should
be noted that copyright protection in the United Kingdom is automatic for
the author, and there is no need to apply or pay a fee for copyright.
However, in order to sell or transfer copyright, a written contract would
need to be drafted and signed to indicate the transfer of ownership.
Parties interested in such a contractual arrangement may contact the
Claimant directly at Re_wired@ymail.com.
THE DUTY OF CANDOUR FOR PUBLIC
AUTHORITIES
In accordance with UK public law,
public authorities are subject to a duty of candour. This duty requires
them to assist the court in reaching the correct result and improve
standards in public administration, rather than seeking to win litigation
at all costs. Public servants are expected to fully explain the
circumstances and reasons behind their actions, as stated by Lord Donaldson MR in R v
Lancashire County Council ex p. Huddleston.
v File Link Location
ό https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/
appeals-judicial-review-cps-prosecuting-decisions
ό https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/
government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data
/file/285368/Tsol_discharging_1_.pdf
Health and Social Care
In addition to the duty of candour
imposed on public authorities, there is also a contractual duty of candour
placed on all providers of healthcare services in the UK. This duty
requires them to provide users and other relevant individuals with all
necessary information in the event of a "Reportable
Patient Safety Incident" that could have or did result
in moderate or severe harm or death. This duty of candour is in line with
the regulations set out in the Health and Social Care Act 2008
and the 2014 Regulations
governing "Regulated Activities"
in NHS hospitals.
We respectfully request that these
matters be given due consideration in the proceedings and that appropriate
actions be taken to protect the interests of all parties involved.
a)
Making
A Complaint:
1/ The
procedure for making a complaint about the conduct of an official person or
other is simple and informal. A complaint is at its best made in writing but may be orally.
b)
Arranging
A Meeting!
1/ General
meeting.
2/ Engrossment.
3/ General
damages.
4/ Prominence.
Draft Parts
- Companies Act 2006 Directors' Duties
- The Company Acts 1985
ό https://www.jmw.co.uk/services-for-business/corporate/legal-advice-company-directors/criminal-Prosecution-involving-company-directors
ό https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/contact-us/how-to-complain/disputes-between-officeholders-and-or-members-of-small-proprietary-companies-video-transcript/
ό https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/lexispsl/corporatecrime/document/391421/55KB-9471-F188-N2X0-00000-00/Companies_Act_offences_overview
a) A Making a material omission from a
statement relating to a companys affairs
b) Destroying, mutilating, or falsifying
company records
c) A
d) Housing Act 1988
e) Company Limited by Guarantee Act 1989
f) Not having a Share Capital Act 2006
g) Agreeing to Indemnify Sureties
h) Offences against the Person Act 1861 s.18
i)
The Prosecution of Offences Act 1985
j)
Criminal Law Act 1967
k) Criminal Evidence Act 1984 / 1898
l)
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) codes of practice
A Reference Towards the Time Limitation Act 1980
1/ In the Table at The Bottom of This
Document Below is [Exhibit C]
2/ An example of the Time Limitation Act and its relevance
in these proceedings is the following: -
3/ A claim
in fraud against the trustee of a trust
is not subject to any limitation.
4/ There is
no time limit under the time limitation Act 1996 - 1980 when
accounting for certain aspects of the law and this includes fraud and
denial.
5/ Throughout
a large part of the Now Claimants life the Members of the Metropolitan
Police Force and the Enfield
Council Staff undermined the Now Claimant from any Justice so that he could
bring a case against themselves, the Members of the Metropolitan Police
Force and the Enfield
Council Staff achieved stopping the Now Claimant by using an: - abuse of
process, Malfeasance in Public Office Targeted Malicious, and this is
what caused a pro longed delay in this claim. The actions of these officers
broke mutable laws and just to name one we would say: - the Interference
with the course of justice 1963.
6/ The Now Claimant
produces considerable evidence within this document that accounts for: -
Extraordinary Circumstances, which is the key element to continue ahead
with this claim as it was not the Now Claimants fault for these prolonged
delays.
|
|
Part 1
THE
CLAIMANTS
GENERAL INFORMATION
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INFORMATION
A.
This Document Is in Pursuit
for A
.
.
...
............
3
B.
The Herein Context
.
.
...
.........
.
3
C. The
Years
.
.
...
.........
.
3
THE CLAIMANTS
GENERAL INFORMATION
INFORMATION
A. This Document Is in Pursuit for A: -- Mr.
Simon Paul Codell that we name throughout this official document as the
Claimant.
B. The Herein Context,
contained within this document contains a copy of the Now claimants
personal data that the police hold on the Police National Systems that is
known as a Criminal Record or otherwise ACRO Report.
C.
The Years, we as claimants account for are as
follows: 1995 till 2024.
|
|
Part 2
LETTER
OF CLAIM FOR A PNC ACRO REPORT
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS EMAIL
A. Dear
Official Persons of Relevance.
...
.
.........
.
3
LETTER OF CLAIM FOR A PNC
ACRO REPORT
PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS EMAIL.
Dear Official Persons of Relevance.
·
We
hope this letter finds you well. We are writing to bring to your attention
a matter of utmost importance that requires immediate action and attention
from your offices.
·
The
purpose of this letter is to formally request an Official Investigation
into a series of events that have caused significant harm to the Now Claimants
life, who is details we enclose throughout this Official Document as Mr.
Simon Paul Cordell.
·
The
Claimant has and continues to be sustain Personal
and Property Damage due to no fault of his own as a result
from failures that were caused by Our
Listed as Liable running companys activities faults
employees.
·
We
as the Claimant Support Team will demonstrate throughout this Official
Document how the Now Claimant has suffered from: --
·
General
Damages = General
Damages Relating Towards the Impact Within the Claimants Life Referring to
Such Issues As: --
a.
Pain And Suffering
Caused by Our
Listed as Liable Within This Official Document,
b.
Forced Changes to The
Claimants Lifestyle,
c.
Mental Trauma Also
Caused by The Mentioned in This Data,
Ψ And: --
·
Special
Damages = Special
Damages Relate to The Impact caused by Our Listed
as Liable within this Official Document to the Now
Claimants Life Referring to Such Issues As: --
a.
Loss Of Earnings,
b.
Future Loss of
Earnings,
c.
Medical Treatment,
d.
Future Medical Treatments,
e.
Transport Expenses
Relating to Incidents as Below,
f.
Changes To the Now
Claimants Living Environment.
--
·
The Now Claimant Requests to
Seek Justice Through:
a. Arrests, Charges Brought to Court,
And Guilty Convictions
b. As Well As Well as Requests of PNC
Record Amendments, Local Systems Deletion, Local Systems - Amendment of
Information Contained Within.
·
Below
is a drafted list of particulars of claims, what are for an amicable
settlement (out of Court and/or in of court) due to incidents that: -- Our Listed as Liable are
vicariously liable for.
·
It
is Our firm belief that a thorough and Comprehensive Investigation is not
only warranted due to the evidence we submit to the relevant Official
Persons of interest to these proceedings but that they are also crucial to
uphold the principles of justice for accountability of wrongs.
·
The
impact of these wrongs continues to be substantially affecting the Now
Claimant and his loved within their personal lives while negatively
affecting their well-beings and as a result these Impacts also cause and
have caused them a significant financial loss that they now seek to recover
as described in Recovery of The
Claimants Losses, as described below.
·
In
light of the gravity of the situation, we kindly request your immediate
attention to Our Matters of Concern that we Raise to Yourselves.
·
We
expect that the appropriate authorities will conduct a diligent
investigation leading to the identification and apprehension of those
responsible, followed by legal proceedings that result in guilty
convictions while rectifying the damages caused to the Now Claimant and his
family. Furthermore, we anticipate that the costs and damages incurred as a
result of this ordeal will be appropriately addressed and reimbursed.
·
We
are confident that your office will handle this matter with the utmost
professionalism, and We appreciate your prompt attention to Our Requests.
·
Please
feel free to contact us by using the details provided below that we have
Categorized as Who to Contact,
within this Official Document
to discuss any further details you may need or to provide Us with updates
on the progress of this investigation as to Our Requests made to
Yourselves.
·
Thank
you for your immediate attention to this grave matter. We look forward to a
swift resolution and a restoration of justice.
Sincerely,
Mr. Simon Paul Cordell and Others.
|
|
Part 3
OUR
LISTED AS LIABLE
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. OUR LISTED AS LIABLE
1)
Metropolitan Police Force.
.
...
...
.........
.
3
2)
Enfield Council
.
.
.
...
.........
.
.
3
3)
Neighbourhood Watch Team
.
...
...
.........
.
3
4)
Enfield Homes
.
.
.
...
.........
.
3
5) National Health Services NHS
.
...
.........
.
3
OUR
LISTED AS LIABLE
2. OUR LISTED AS LIABLE
1+ Provided Below Is the Accused
Company Details in Year Order of Accused as Liable.
· Please take a note that Due to the size of the
file, we have attached the accused as labels names in a separately attached
sheet.
· For the following claims that Our Client has
against you, which we have detailed in this official document and its
affiliated documents, according to the years relevant to each Recipient:
a) 1 of 3 years 1997: --
1. The Youth Justice Team,
Enfield, UK.
a. Address:
The Enfield Youth Offending Unit, CLAVERINGS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, 3 South
Way, Edmonton, London, N9 0ab.
b. Tel: 020 8379
5800.
2. Youth Social Services, Enfield, UK.
a. Address:
1 Orton Grove, Enfield
EN1 4TU.
b. Tel: 020 8379
58002
3. The Metropolitan Police Force & Other
Associated Forces.
a. Address:
The Enfield Youth Offending Unit, CLAVERINGS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, 3 South
Way, Edmonton, London, N9 0ab.
b. Tel: 020 8379
5800.
4. Her Majestys Courts, UK.
a. Address:
New Scotland Yard, Victoria Embankment, London, SW1A2.
b. Tel: 999 / 101.
5. The Crown Prosecution Services CPS, UK.
a. Address:
The Crown Prosecution Service, 102 Petty France, London, SW1H 9EA.
b. Tel: 999 / 101.
6. The Acro Department of Criminal Records, UK.
a. Address:
ACRO, PO Box 481, Fareham, Hampshire, PO14 9FS, United Kingdom1
b. Address 2: Youth Social Services, Enfield, UK address and
telephone number web search results title: Enfield Council.
c. Tel: +44 (0)23
8047 99202.
b) 1 of 3 years 2006: --
7. The Enfield Homes Repair Teams, London, UK.
a. Address:
1-3 GENTLEMANS Row, EN2 6PT.
b. Tel: 020 8379
1000 option 4, then option 2 for council housing repairs.
c) 1 Of 3 Years 2012 & Onwards: --
8. The Bow 999 Call Centre, London, UK.
a. Address: 111 Bow Road, Mile End, London, E3 2AN.
b. Tel: 020 7515 1212.
9. The Lambeth 999 Call Centre, London, UK,
a. Address: 109 Lambeth Road, SE1 7 London, United Kingdom.
b. Tel: is not directly listed.
10. The Hendon 999 Call Centre,
London, UK,
a. Address: Aerodrome Rd, London NW9 5JE.
b. Tel 1: +4487078945611.
c. Tel 2: Alternatively, you can also try dialling 020 8358 0675.
11. The Enfield Council, North, London, UK.
a. Address: Silver St, London EN1 3XA.
b. Tel 1 Civic Centre: 020 8379 1000.
a. Tel 2 Insurance: 0208 379 1476.
12. The Enfield Neighbourhood Watch Teams, North,
London, UK.
a. Address: Tenancy Management Officer Council Housing, The Edmonton Centre,
36-44 South Mall, Edmonton N9 0TN.
b. Tel 1: General Enquiries: 020 8379 10001.
c. Tel 2: Right to Buy Team: 020 8375 80042.
13. NHS & Private Mental Health Teams, North,
London, UK.
a. Address 1 NHS:
NHS Resolution, 8th Floor, 10 S Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU.
b. Tel 1 NHS: 020 7811
2700.
--
c. Address 2 Private Mental Health Teams: The Murphy Physiotherapy Clinic located at 10 Greystoke Gardens,
Enfield EN2 7NX.
d. Tel 2 Private Mental Health Teams: 020 8364 4610.
14. The Burncroft Avenue Community EN3 London, North,
London, UK.
a. Address: *.
b. Tel: *.
15. Other Groups of Involved People List, UK.
a. Address: *.
b. Tel: *.
16. DAC Beachcroft, UK.
a. Address: *.
b. Tel: *.
17. Parliament Members UK.
a. Address: Westminster, London, SW1A 0AA, United Kingdom.
b. Tel: 999 / 101.
|
|
Part 4
WHAT
IS BEING REQUESTED
BY
THE CLAIMANT
&
A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF
THE
CLAIMANTS
REASONS
FOR REQUEST
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. WHAT IS BEING
REQUESTED BY THE CLAIMANT
A. The
Requests We Make Are
.
.
...
.........
3
2. REASONS FOR THE REQUEST
A.
In Between The Years Of
.
.
...
...
.
.
3
B.
The Police Have Not Met the Required Safeguard
Procedures
.
3
C.
The Police Have a Legal Obligation to The
Claimant
.
...
...
3
D. Fraud
.
.
...
...
.
3
A. Statutory
Responsibilities Code of Conduct and Code of Accountability
3
B. Statutory
Conspiracy
.
.
...
...
.
3
C. Criminal
Liability
.
.
...
...
.
3
D.
Levels of
Seriousness
.
.
...
...
.
3
A.
The
Equality Act 2010
.
.
...
..
.
3
B.
Compliance
with GDPR
.
.
...
...
3
C.
Data
Minimization
.
.
...
...
.
...
3
D.
Data
Subject Control
.
.
...
...
.
3
E.
Transparency
.
.
...
...
.
3
F.
Legal
Compliance
.
.
...
...
.
3
G.
Data
Security
.
.
...
...
.
3
H.
Data
Retention Policies
.
.
...
...
.
3
I.
Reputation
and Trust
.
.
...
...
.
3
WHAT
IS BEING REQUESTED
BY
THE CLAIMANT
3.
WHAT IS BEING REQUESTED BY THE
CLAIMANT?
D.
The Requests We Make Are: --
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF
THE CLAIMANTS
REASONS FOR REQUEST
4.
REASONS FOR THE REQUEST
A.
In Between The Years Of 2012 till date of the year of 18/08/2023 members of the
metropolitan police force continued to harass Mr
a Simon Paul Cordell the claimant in an unfair manner that has caused him
alarm and distress and loss of earnings.
B.
The Police Have Not Met the
Required Safeguard Procedures when processing and archiving sensitive personal
data in pursuit of the Now Claimant and he requests for all data held in
his name to be erased by themselves.
C.
The Police Have a Legal
Obligation to The Claimant to erase the data under fair
circumstances when requested.
D. Fraud:
A. Fraudulent Information
a. Can find its way into a person's
criminal record due to: --
i. Example One: Various Errors or
ii. Example Two: Malicious Intent.
B. Example One,
Various Errors
i. If someone else's criminal activities are
mistakenly attributed to an innocent individual, they have a valid reason
to request corrections to the Acro report.
C. Example Two,
Malicious Intent
ii. If someone has been a victim of forged documents
or identity fraud leading to a wrongful conviction or criminal record, they
may request changes to rectify the situation.
E. Compliance with GDPR: The UK GDPR requires organizations to
respect individuals' data rights, including the right to erasure. ACRO, as
a data controller, must comply with this regulation by providing
individuals with the means to request the erasure of their personal data
when those people meet certain conditions or criteria.
F. Data Minimization: ACRO reports often contain sensitive
personal information, and retaining such data indefinitely can pose privacy
risks. Creating a document outlining the right to erasure ensures that ACRO
only retains data that is necessary and proportionate for its purpose.
G. Data Subject
Control: The
right to erasure empowers individuals to have more control over their
personal data. By providing information on this right, ACRO demonstrates
its commitment to respecting individuals' wishes regarding their data.
H. Transparency: Demonstrating transparency is a
fundamental principle of data protection regulations like GDPR. Providing
clear information about the right to erasure and how individuals can
exercise this right enhances transparency and builds trust.
I. Legal Compliance: Failing to provide individuals with
information about their right to erasure can lead to legal consequences,
including fines and regulatory action. Ensuring that ACRO has a documented
process for handling erasure requests is crucial to avoid legal liabilities.
J. Data Security: Keeping data that is no longer
necessary or relevant can pose security risks. By implementing a process
for erasure, ACRO can reduce the potential for data breaches and
unauthorized access to personal information.
K. Data Retention
Policies:
Having a document outlining the right to erasure can be part of a broader
data retention policy. This policy helps ACRO determine how long it should
retain data and when they should securely erase it.
L.
Reputation and Trust: Demonstrating a commitment to data
privacy and respecting individuals' rights can enhance ACRO's reputation
and foster trust with the public, clients, and partners.
Statutory Responsibilities Code
of Conduct and Code of Accountability
In accordance with
the local government Acts and statutes, including The Local Government Act 2000
and the Local Government & Housing Act 1989, it is
imperative that those working within Enfield
Council adhere to a
higher level of accountability and code of conduct. This is necessary to
ensure that all actions withstand parliamentary scrutiny, public judgments
on propriety, and professional codes of conduct.
The current legal
claim we centre around breaches of responsibilities, which have taken place
within the context of Enfield Council. These breaches are attributable to
the following failures:
1/
The Monitoring Office: Failed to discharge their statutory
responsibilities in preventing the existence of broken laws and regulated
standards, as detailed in the table presented in Exhibit *****.
2/
Enfield Director of Governance: Failed to discharge their statutory
responsibilities, leading to the perpetuation of criminal and civil
wrongdoings by employees under their supervision.
3/
Director of Operations at Enfield Council: Failed to fulfil their statutory
duties in ensuring compliance with protocols and maintaining acceptable
service standards, resulting in compromised services provided to Mr. S. P.
Cordell and his family members.
4/
Counter Fraud Department at Enfield Council: Failed to take appropriate action
when presented with evidence pertaining to fraudulent allegations against
Mr. S. P. Cordell, thereby participating in morally wrongful activities
that threaten his well-being, freedom, reputation, and property.
5/
Director of Finance at Enfield Council: Failed to discharge their statutory
responsibilities, resulting in unsatisfactory performance, which had
significant negative impacts on public safety and property within the
Borough.
6/
The Shareholder Managers at Enfield Council: Failed to exercise due diligence in
their management responsibilities, leading to the misuse of properties
owned and managed by Enfield Council for criminal purposes.
7/
Director of Human Resources at Enfield Council: Failed to provide adequate advice
and assistance to Mr. S. P. Cordell regarding housing policies, leading to
unfair and unreasonable treatment.
8/ Other Enfield Council Members and
Officers:
Failed to fulfil their statutory duties in preventing or intervening in the
events that gave rise to this claim.
Throughout the
process, Mr. S. P. Cordell and his family members have faced constant
obstruction and undermining when raising concerns through the proper
channels. The actions of Enfield Council staff have been aimed at weakening
Mr. S. P. Cordell's position and preventing the truth from emerging through
any complaints or interactions.
Enfield Council's
staff exhibited unsatisfactory performance by failing to ensure a fair and
positive conclusion to the events, resulting in unnecessary risks to public
safety and property. They abused the authority vested in them, turning
properties into captive houses and engaging in criminal activities.
Furthermore, Enfield Council
failed to provide appropriate advice and support in line with their housing
policies. They also neglected their duty to create an attractive and safe
environment for Burncroft Avenue and the attached neighbourhoods, and to
prevent and reduce the fear of crime.
By engaging in
fraudulent practices and fabricating evidence against Mr. S. P. Cordell
during court proceedings, the Enfield Council staff violated the laws of the
United Kingdom. Even when caught red-handed, they persisted in their
fraudulent actions, demonstrating a malicious abuse of the legal process.
These instances of
misconduct and underperformance highlight a failure in the Enfield Council's
commitment to maintain a culture of honesty, openness, and efficient
internal controls. The failure to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment
and fair investigations has resulted in compromised internal controls,
jeopardizing the well-being of the company and its clients.
It is essential
that these actions and behaviors of Enfield
Council staff are
reviewed to prioritize public safety and address the concerns raised. The Enfield Council's
services and management structure need thorough analysis and improvement to
ensure the achievement of ambitious standards of corporate and personal
conduct in public services.
Statutory Conspiracy:
Under Section
1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977, a statutory
conspiracy occurs when a person agrees with one or more other
individuals to pursue a course of conduct. If this agreement, when
carried out according to their intentions, would necessarily result in or
involve the commission of an offense by one or more parties to the
agreement, it constitutes a conspiracy to commit the offense1.
Here are the key points regarding statutory
conspiracy under The Criminal Law
Act 1977:
1/ Agreement: The offense involves an
agreement between individuals.
2/ Course of Conduct: The agreement pertains to a
specific course of conduct.
3/ Intentions: The agreement must be
carried out in accordance with the parties intentions.
4/ Offense Commission: The agreed-upon conduct will
necessarily lead to the commission of an offense by one or more parties.
5/ Impossible Offense: Even if the offense is
impossible due to certain facts, conspiracy still applies unless those
facts render the offense genuinely impossible.
In summary, an oral agreement can indeed
constitute a statutory conspiracy if
it meets the criteria outlined in the Criminal Law Act 1977. The key factor
is whether the agreed-upon conduct would lead to the commission of an
offense. If so, the conspiracy exists
regardless of whether the offense is ultimately carried out
However, its important to note that liability
for an offence may be incurred without knowledge on the part of the person
committing it of any particular fact or circumstance necessary for the
commission of the offence. In such cases, a person shall not be
guilty of conspiracy to commit that offence unless they and at least one
other party to the agreement intend or know that the relevant fact or
circumstance shall or will exist at the time when the conduct constituting
the offence is to take place1.
In summary, a non-oral agreement can
indeed form the basis for a conspiracy charge under the Criminal Law Act
1977, as long as the necessary elements are met. The key factor is the
intention or knowledge of the parties involved regarding the commission of
the offence. If they agree to pursue a course of
conduct that would lead to an offence, they can be charged with conspiracy,
even if the agreement is not oral
Criminal Liability:
An Act to amend the law of England and Wales by
abolishing the division of crimes into felonies and misdemeanours
and to amend and simplify the law in respect of matters arising from or
related to that division or the abolition of it; to do away (within or
without England and Wales) with certain obsolete crimes together with the
torts of maintenance and champerty; and for purposes connected therewith.
The Criminal Liability Act 1977 is an
important piece of legislation in the UK that specifically pertains to the critical
aspects of criminal liability. This Act has several key provisions
that are vital for understanding how criminal liability is established
under this legal framework1.
One of the significant aspects of
the Criminal Liability Act 1977 is
its focus on the mental and physical elements necessary for establishing
criminal liability. Lets break down these elements:
- Physical Element (Actus Reus):
- The
physical element refers to the actual conduct or action that constitutes
a criminal offence. It involves the external behavior or act
committed by an individual.
- For
criminal liability to arise, there must be a voluntary act or
omission (failure to act) that violates the law. This actus reus is a
crucial component in determining guilt.
- Examples
of actus reus include theft, assault, murder, and other criminal
acts.
- Mental Element (Mens
Rea):
- The
mental element, also known as mens rea,
focuses on the mental state or intention of the person committing the
act.
- Different
offences require varying levels of mens
rea. Some offences require specific intent (where the accused
intended a particular outcome), while others only require general
intent (where the accused acted recklessly or negligently).
- Common
levels of mens rea include:
- Intention: The
accused deliberately intended to commit the offence.
- Recklessness: The
accused was aware of the risk but proceeded with the act regardless.
- Negligence: The
accused failed to exercise reasonable care, leading to the criminal
act.
- The
Criminal Liability Act 1977 outlines specific mental states required
for various offences.
- Corporate Criminal Liability:
In
summary, the Criminal Liability Act
1977 plays a crucial role in defining criminal liability in
the UK, emphasizing both the physical act and the mental state of the
accused. Additionally, ongoing discussions
address corporate criminal liability and potential reforms2
Levels of
Seriousness
Government Officials and Members of The Public
have committed severe offenses, including attempted murder and torture.
Government officials are accused of intentionally inflicting pain and
suffering on Mr. S. P. Cordell, during the course of their official duties,
while members of the public have also, engaged in intentional reckless
behaviour towards Mr S. P Cordell and these incidents took a place from
2012 to 2024. The Accused as libels
behaviours include: --
1/ The Act of Restraining a Victim's Freedom of Movement
from A Specific Location.
Misleading the Competence
of the Court
2/ Providing False Information or Misrepresenting Facts In A
Formal Written Statement.
Fabricating or Tampering
with Evidence
3/ Engaging In the Creation or Manipulation Of Evidence To
Deceive The Legal System.
Falsely Implicating an
Innocent Person
4/ Preventing The Giving of Evidence
Obstructing the process of
presenting evidence in a legal proceeding.
5/ Perjury And Allied Offenses
Knowingly providing false
testimony under oath or committing related offenses.
6/ Contradictory Statements by Persons Giving Evidence on
Oath
Providing conflicting
statements while testifying under oath.
7/ Mental Element
Wrongfully accusing an
innocent individual of a crime, they did not commit with the deliberate
intention to pervert the course of justice.
These
actions of the accused as
liable go to the
boundaries of criminal law and moral conscience. It is important for those
responsible to be held accountable for their actions.
Levels of Severity
[✞⚰️] Attempted Murder - Criminal Attempts Act 1981:
1/ Government Officials:
Members of the Enfield Council,
Metropolitan Police, and Private and NHS Mental Health Teams, represented
by the symbol [✞⚰️], executed a deliberate and
premeditated act with the intent to cause the death of the current
claimant.
2/
Members of
the Public: Similarly, residents of Burncroft
Avenue, denoted by the symbol [✞⚰️], also made an intentional
effort to end the life of the claimant.
It is said by us that once our accused as liable realised that their
crimes committed to kill may not work to kill Mr. Simon Paul Cordell that
they then used their evil acts to continue to torture the Claimant in the
hope to make him Mental ill at the minimum to cover up what they had
committed.
Torture - Criminal Justice
Act s.134
Intentional
Reckless Behaviour:
While presenting substantial evidence, we allege that both
government officials and members of the public we have named and identified
committed, at the very least, attempted murder under the Criminal Attempts Act 1981.
Furthermore, they are also accused of engaging in the following misconduct:
1/ Government Officials:
·
Allowed Banging on Walls to be permitted to our client.
·
Allowed Banging on Floors to be permitted to our client.
2/ Members of the Public:
·
Banging on walls
·
Banging on floors
By outlining these seriousness levels and
associated offenses, it becomes evident that the actions of both government
officials and members of the public have breached the boundaries of
criminal law and moral conscience.
|
|
ABOUT
THE
CLAIMANTS
EXHIBITED
FILES
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3. ABOUT THE FILE TYPES
WE EXHIBIT
A. This Files Types We Exhibit Include
.
.
...
....
3
ABOUT
THE CLAIMANTS
EXHIBITED
FILES
5.
ABOUT THE FILE TYPES WE EXHIBIT
A. The File Types We
Exhibit as Included:
·
Emails
Consisting of The Following and More: Court Correspondence, Solicitor
Documents.
1) Newspaper Articles,
2) Telephone Calls,
3) Telephone Texts,
4) Hand Typed & Computer Wrote
Notes,
5) Court Applications,
6) Letters,
7) Videos,
that we submit as evidence against
the Metropolitan police force
on behalf of the Claimant a Mr. Simon Paul Cordell.
|
|
DATES
OF ARREST NOT CONTAINED IN
THE
ACRO REPORT
ATTACHED
TO THE CLAIMANT
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4. DATES OF ARREST NOT
CONTAINED IN THE ACRO REPORT ATTACHED TO THE CLAIMANT
A. Dates Of Arrests Not Contained in the
ACRO Report
.
....
...
.
3
DATES
OF ARREST NOT CONTAINED IN
THE
ACRO REPORT
ATTACHED
TO THE CLAIMANT
6.
DATES OF ARREST NOT CONTAINED IN
THE ACRO REPORT ATTACHED TO THE CLAIMANT -
A. "Dates Of Arrests Not Contained in the ACRO Report" refers to a situation in which there
is missing or incomplete information regarding specific arrest dates. The
phrase implies that the Claimant has not included an arrest or more than
one arrest record in this provided report as he has not obtained it from
the ACRO Criminal Records Office and that there may still be a need to
obtain this additional information dependent on whether
the ACRO Criminal Records Office or any relevant law enforcement agency
requests for such data to still be obtained.
|
|
OUR REQUEST SHEET
&
OUR
EXHIBITS
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Our Request Sheet:
--
A. About Our Request Sheet:
.
.
...
.
.
3
B. The Development, Handling, Usage
& Archiving of Government Data and Records & Our Rights
.
.
...
.
.
3
a.
National Systems -
Deletion (PNC, IDENT1, NDNAD)
.
.
3
b.
PNC Record Amendments
.
.
...
.
.
.
3
c.
Local Systems
Deletion:
.
.
.....................
.
.
.
3
d.
Local Systems
Amendment of Information Contained Within:
.
.
3
OUR EXHIBITS: --
Our exhibits can be found in our
Evidence Folder
2. About Police Identification Markers:
A. About
police identification markers
...
...
.
.
3
3. About The Arrests and Interruptions Made by Police:
A.
About Arrests and
Interruptions Made by Police:
.
3
OUR REQUEST SHEET
&
OUR
EXHIBITS
7.
ABOUT OUR REQUEST SHEET: --
·
The reason for including the "Our Request Sheet" in this
document is to ensure clarity and specificity in the Claimant's requests to
relevant authorities regarding:
1) The Protection of Individuals Human Rights, I.E. The Right to Life
Article 2.
2) The Development,
Handling, Usage & Archiving of Government Data and Records.
The Protection of Individuals Human Rights, I.E. The Right to Life
Article 2.
++++
The Development, Handling, Usage & Archiving of
Government Data and Records
& Our Rights!
A. NATIONAL SYSTEMS - DELETION (PNC, IDENT1, NDNAD):
·
The Claimant's primary request within this
section is the deletion of their data from the national systems, which
encompass vital databases such as the Police National Computer (PNC),
IDENT1, and the National DNA Database (NDNAD).
B. PNC RECORD AMENDMENTS:
·
Within this request, the Claimant seeks
amendments to any records present on the Police National Computer (PNC)
that relate to this case. This is to ensure that the data accurately
reflects the events and circumstances involved.
C. LOCAL SYSTEMS DELETION:
·
The Claimant's request for the deletion of
their data from local police systems is vital in safeguarding their privacy
and ensuring that their personal information is not misused or retained
unnecessarily.
D. LOCAL SYSTEMS - AMENDMENT OF INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN:
·
To achieve accuracy and completeness, the
Claimant also requests amendments to any information contained within local
police systems concerning this case. This ensures that the data held at the
local level aligns with the facts and details presented.
ABOUT POLICE IDENTIFICATION MARKERS:
B. About police identification markers:
·
The inclusion of information regarding police
identification markers is crucial due to its significance in this case.
These markers serve as unique codes or symbols used by law enforcement
agencies for identification purposes. Further details are necessary to
fully understand their role and implications.
ABOUT THE ARRESTS AND INTERRUPTIONS MADE BY POLICE:
B. About Arrests and Interruptions Made by Police:
·
The reason for addressing the arrests and
interruptions made by the police in this document is to provide a
comprehensive account of events and their impact. By doing so, the Claimant
aims to ensure that all pertinent information is presented accurately to
the relevant authorities and that any necessary actions are taken.
|
|
STATIONERY
DUTIES,
LAWS
& REGULATIONS
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
5. STATIONERY DUTIES
A.
Human Rights Building a Fairer Britain
.
..........
.
3
B.
The Equality Strategy Building a Fairer Britain
.
..........
...
.
3
6. OTHER UNITED KINGDOM
LAWS AND REGULATIONS:
A. ****************
..
.
.
...
.........
3
STATIONERY
DUTIES,
LAWS
& REGULATIONS
BITS
8.
STATIONERY DUTIES
A. Human Rights:
--
1) Building a Fairer Britain
.
2) Regrettably, it is widely acknowledged
by citizens both in the UK and around the World that Law Enforcement
Agencies bear the responsibility of upholding and safeguarding the human
rights of individuals. However, this does not always translate into
reality, as some law enforcement officers have been found to be in breach
of these principles.
3) In this context, the Now Claimant
finds himself tragically reduced to being just another statistic in the
alarming trend of police cases gone horrendously wrong due to Fault of the
Police.
4) The Now Claimant points out several
Human Rights that the police are criticized for violating, all of which are
pertinent to this particular claim: --
a. Right to Life: The use of excessive force by the
police, resulting in injuries or even fatalities, raises profound concerns
regarding the fundamental right to life.
b. Right to Liberty and
Security:
Instances of arbitrary arrests, unjustified detentions, or failure to
adhere to proper legal protocols encroach upon the cherished rights to
personal liberty and security.
c. Right to a Fair
Trial:
Actions taken by the police that undermine the fairness of a trial, such as
mishandling evidence, neglecting to inform suspects of their legal rights,
or employing coercive methods during interviews, constitute direct
violations of the right to a fair trial.
d. Freedom from Torture
and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment: The mistreatment of individualswhether through
physical or psychological meanswhile in police custody flagrantly
contradicts the foundational principle of freedom from torture and
degrading treatment.
e. Freedom of
Expression and Assembly: The unwarranted use of force during protests or
demonstrations encroaches upon the right to freely express opinions and
engage in peaceful assembly.
f. Privacy: The intrusion of unwarranted
surveillance or breaches of privacy during police investigations elicit
grave concerns with respect to the right to privacy.
g. Non-Discrimination: Discriminatory actions by the
police, including practices such as racial profiling or the unjust
targeting of specific groups, constitute a blatant violation of the right
to non-discrimination.
5) The Now Claimant's case serves as a
stark reminder of the urgent need to address these breaches of human rights
within the framework of law enforcement practices.
B. The Equality Strategy: --
a. Building a Fairer
Britain: --
·
The
Equality Strategy, "Building a Fairer Britain," is a pivotal
framework designed to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their
background, race, gender, or other characteristics, have equal access to
opportunities, justice, and protection under the law. This strategy is
instrumental in promoting social justice and addressing systemic
inequalities within the United Kingdom.
b. A Comprehensive
Approach: --
·
In
tandem with "Building a Fairer Britain," the United Kingdom's
commitment to equality is reflected in a multifaceted approach encompassing
various aspects of society. This includes, but is not limited to,
legislation, policies, and initiatives aimed at eradicating discrimination,
promoting diversity, and fostering inclusive communities.
The Equality Act 2010
The Equality Act of 2010 aims to prevent discrimination and promote
equality in society. It replaced the Race Relations Act 1976 and the Race
Relations Act 2000, which are no longer in effect. Additionally, the
Harassment and Stalking Acts of 1997 are relevant in addressing instances
of harassment and stalking.
However, it is disheartening to note that the Enfield
Council has failed to fulfil its obligation to prevent discrimination and
harassment, despite being mandated to do so. The council must take
immediate action when made aware of such instances, but they have not done
so in the case of our client.
Furthermore, it is crucial that government officials, who are being
accused of wrongdoing, actively cooperate with residents to resolve reports
of anti-social behaviour. It is unacceptable for these officials to
manipulate official records in Favor of any party involved, as we have
observed in this case.
Regrettably, no proper investigation took place despite
unquestionable evidence, and the Enfield Council
failed to take necessary actions in the right direction. Respect and
confidentiality, which are vital aspects of an accessible and supportive
investigative service, reached an all-time low due to continuous abuse.
The Enfield Council's negligence and mishandling of
complaints made on behalf of our client, Mr. S. P. Cordell, have not been
addressed for wrongful reasons. Moreover, multiple breaches of the Data
Protection Act 1998/GDPR 2016 have occurred, indicating a lack of proper regulation
of general data protection.
It is alarming to discover that the Enfield Council
persistently relies on anonymous and bogus complaints stored in their
computer system, as evidenced by comparing data within their court orders
and the data received through a Freedom of Information Act 2000 request.
This practice raises serious concerns about the credibility of their
processes and decision-making.
Certain aspects of the Enfield Council's
organizational structure have displayed misconduct in public office by wilfully engaging in targeted malice against Mr. S. P.
Cordell, which is both illegal and unethical.
Therefore, it is imperative that the Enfield Council
rectify these issues promptly, hold those responsible accountable for their
actions, and take immediate steps to ensure justice, equality, and respect
for all residents.
9.
OTHER UNITED KINGDOM LAWS AND
REGULATIONS:
A.
Give
B.
Give
C. Give
Can you
provide me with a comprehensive list of reasons that UK government
officials would harass a person from an early age. i.e. police. Council and
the UK Acts of laws that go with them.
Certainly! Harassment can take various forms and may occur
for different reasons. Here are some potential reasons why UK government
officials, including police and council members, might harass an
individual:
- Power Dynamics and Abuse of Authority: Harassment can stem from power
imbalances. Officials in positions of authority may misuse their power
to intimidate or mistreat others.
- Discrimination and Prejudice: Harassment can be motivated by
prejudice based on factors such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender,
sexual orientation, or disability. Discriminatory attitudes may lead
officials to target specific individuals unfairly.
- Personal Vendettas or Grudges: Sometimes,
personal conflicts or vendettas can result in harassment. An official
may harbor resentment or animosity towards someone and use their
position to harass them.
- Political or Ideological Differences: Harassment may occur due to
differing political views or ideologies. Officials may target
individuals who hold opposing beliefs or challenge the status quo.
- Whistleblowing and Retaliation: Individuals who expose
corruption, misconduct, or illegal activities within government
institutions may face retaliation. Officials might harass
whistleblowers to discourage them from speaking out.
- Social or Economic
Factors: Harassment can be influenced by socioeconomic
factors. For instance, officials may target vulnerable populations,
such as those experiencing poverty or homelessness.
- Lack of Accountability: When there is insufficient
oversight or accountability, officials may feel emboldened to engage
in harassment without fear of consequences.
- Workplace Culture and Norms: Organizational culture plays a
role. If a workplace tolerates or even encourages harassment,
officials may engage in such behavior.
- Inadequate Training and Awareness: Lack of training on respectful
behavior and awareness of harassment issues can contribute to
problematic conduct by officials.
- Personal Bias and Stereotypes: Officials may hold biased
views based on stereotypes, leading them to harass certain
individuals.
Its essential to note that the UK
government has policies and legal protections in place to address
harassment. For instance:
If you believe you are experiencing
harassment, consider seeking legal advice and reporting the incidents to
the appropriate authorities. Remember that everyone deserves to be treated
with respect and dignity. 🌟
|
|
CONCERNS
ABOUT
THE
NOW CLAIMANTS
FUTURE
EMPLOYMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
a) The Now Claimants Future Employment.
CONCERNS
ABOUT
THE
NOW CLAIMANTS
FUTURE
EMPLOYMENT
a) The Now Claimant
Future Employment
7/ The Enfield Councils
staff understood what my intentions in life were. My destiny involved
building a festival. I had continually promoted this information to the
public, my loved ones, and my local council The Enfield Council.
8/ I worked closely alongside the Enfield Council
at music events in my local parks as well as attending the civic centre
about ways forward to achieve my positive gaols in life.
9/ Following my dreams also meant that I
worked in my local community hall and became a trusted key holder within a
brief period of time. In my brief time at the community hall, I had to have
board room meeting and these meetings involved Members of the Enfield Council
as they were the; Building Managers who let the building out to be a
community hall.
10/ The Enfield Councils
staff understood that my companies could float shares and have a Board of
Directors of the Organisation and the stipulations that can be involved in
such companies running aims and in short this means that my reputation has
to me intact.
11/ By the Enfield Council
Staff forging paperwork to gain a Asbo in my name and then forging more
paperworks as more official Court orders and then afterwards and once in
trouble using the Mental Health teams to aid as a sharp knife out of a draw
to stab me rather than addressing the true facts in mine and others
official complaints, they contributed towards high levels of concern that
raised breaches of the: - Ill-Treatment
Of Patients And Mental Health Act 1983 S.127. the second of time
that they working for the Enfield Councils aided in created a forged Mental
Health history about my person and now that forged documentation has
negative effects on the rest of my life and this is due to the magnitude of
failed attempts to undermine the defamation of Character by Slandering my reputation
and then on creating large size
documentation that was needed to attempt such illegal activities to a
person to aid in the interference with the course of justice and prevent my
claims getting taken seriously.
12/ For an instance the size of the
documentation is so overwhelming that if I did get arrested by police
officer(s) no police custody officer(s) has the time to read over the
documentation on Rio when booking me into the station to find out if what I
am saying is true and that is that I have never been assessed to me Mental
unwell in all of the assessments I have now got forced to undergo and due
to this they will find me not fit for interview and refer me to the Doctors
for a Mental Health assessment as I seem so well knowing by them. I get
classed as not fit for interviews and taken to a hospital and assessed for
up to 28 days with a possibility of then afterwards getting keep on a
separate wing for treatment as a mental health patient with an extension in
time for a further six months while forced medication in the second stage.
|
|
OUR
RIGHTS TO DELETION
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7.
THE
CLAIMANT RIGHTS TO DELETION
A.
As A Civil Citizen of
The United Kingdom
.
.
...
...
.
..
3
B.
The Right to Erasure
.
.
...
...
.
3
C. The Police
When Processing the Now Claimants Personal Data
...
.
..
3
10. THE CLAIMANT RIGHTS TO DELETION
A. As A Civil Citizen of The United Kingdom the Claimant
has the legal right to request the deletion or removal of his personal data
and this fact comes to reason due to their being No compelling grounds for
its continued retention.
B. The Right to Erasure of personal data is
an absolute must in the right circumstances as documented throughout this
document.
C. The Police When Processing the Now Claimants Personal Data within
accordance to the Data Protection Act
1998 as repealed by the UK-GDPR entered into force on 24 May 2016 and applied since 25 May 2018: --
a.
Are in Breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 as
repealed by the UK-GDPR in a magnitude of different cases
brought against the Claimant and this is alongside with any other police
force company policies that may also come to light due to this application.
b.
The police hold
personal data that they have archived on the Now Claimant that does show
infringements in accordance with its law-abiding purpose of existence.
c.
Within the Police
Forces Acro Report identified by themselves as the Now
Claimants, we have found a large
multitude of data principles
to be in breach by the police and we request for support by the police of
those incidents as amended or deleted as to which way we have requested
below.
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS
FOR DOCUMENT
EASE OF USAGE
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
8.
INSTRUCTIONS
A.
Description of Categories & Table of Contents
.........
3
9.
DESCRIPTION OF CATEGORIES
A.
Brief
Summarized Exploration of This Document
.
.
...
.
.
3
B.
Exhibited
Files
.
.
...
.
...
.
3
C.
Break
Down of Attached Files
.
.
.
.
.
3
10. INFRINGEMENTS
A.
Infringements
.
.
...
.
.
...
.
3
B.
Consequences
of Infringements:
.
.
.
.
.
3
C.
Our
Waver
.
.
...
...
.
...
.
3
HOW TO USE THIS OFFICIAL DOCUMENT
1.
INSTRUCTIONS
A.
Description of Categories & Table of Contents:
--
2.
First
"Description of Categories"
&
3.
Second
"Table of Contents."
B.
This
Official Document is designed
to provide clarity and accessibility to all of its users seeking
information related to the matter at hand. We understand the importance of
efficiently navigating throughout the content within this document.
Therefore, we have incorporated key components to assist you in making the
most effective use of this Data.
C.
"Our Listed as Liable" First
"Description of Categories"
4.
Our titled "Description of Categories" found at the
beginning of this document offers a concise overview of the various
sections and topics covered within. It serves as a roadmap, guiding any
user through the intricacies of the data and information presented. These
categories are carefully structured to facilitate your understanding and
utilization of the content. By referring to this section, you can quickly
discern the purpose and relevance of each category, making it easier to
locate specific information.
D.
For an Example: --
5.
If
you are interested in understanding the nature of the claim, you can refer
to the "General Damages"
category. If you are seeking to understand why the Claimant is requesting
"Special Damages"
or what "Special Damages" account for
within this document the "Description
of Categories" and "Table
of Contents." will provide you with the necessary
information.
11. DESCRIPTION OF CATEGORIES =
A.
Brief Summarized Exploration of This Document =
a.
Refers
to a concise overview or examination of the key points, contents, and main
values within this written document. This process involves extracting the
most relevant information to provide a condensed yet informative summary.
B.
Exhibited Files =
a.
These Exhibited Files" refer to a
collection of documents otherwise known as materials, items that we have
formally presented, displayed, and then on afterwards submitted as
evidence, references, and/or supporting materials in a legal and official
context.
b.
These
files are associated with the requested legal proceedings, / court cases, /
regulatory hearings, or other formal settings where the claimant presents
information or evidence to support or argue a particular case or matter.
C.
Break Down of Our Attached Files =
a.
Our "Break Down of Attached Files"
refers to the process of providing to the relevant Bodies a detailed
explanation and/or analysis of the contents we provide and the significance
of the data we submit in this Official document and that of its attachments
we include throughout our communications.
b.
This
breakdown of the Attached Files
is implemented to help recipients
and/or any other readers to understand
how to keep track of the digital data attached as File Links so that they as the
user do not have to open and review the attachments individually.
12. INFRINGEMENTS
A.
Infringements refer to violations or breaches of rules, laws, rights,
regulations, or agreements. These violations may have occurred in various
contexts, such as:
a.
Legal Debates.
i. Legal
Action,
ii. Regulatory
Infringements.
b.
Intellectual Property Disagreements.
i. Trademark
Infringements,
ii. Copyright
Infringements,
iii. Property
Rights Infringements.
c.
Contractual Disputes
i. Contractual
Infringements
d.
Ethical Rights.
i. Patenting
Infringements,
ii. Ethical
Infringements.
B.
Consequences of Infringements:
i. Financial
Penalties,
ii. Loss
Of Rights,
iii. Reputation
Damage,
iv. Criminal
Charges.
C.
Our Waver
·
The above lists are not
exhausted to their limits as they are just purely an example.
DOCUMENT
USAGE INFORMATION
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
11. BASIS OF THE CLAIM
A.
The
"Basis of the Claim,":
.
.
...
...
...
...
.
3
B.
As
The "Basis of The Claim Is Brought Forth
.
.
...
...
.
3
12. REQUEST SHEET
A.
A "Request Sheet" Is A Formal Document
or Form
.
.
...
.........
3
B. Request Sheets Are A Structured
Means
.
.
...
...
.
..
3
13. IN REFERENCE TOWARDS
A. In Reference Towards the Original
Files Re-Organised
.
.
.
.
3
14. Break =
DOCUMENT
USAGE INFORMATION
13.
BASIS OF THE CLAIM =
A. The "Basis of
the Claim,"
in fact of any claim but in particular to this claim is in pursuit to the fundamental reasons and grounds
upon which a person files a legal claim or lawsuit when brought forth.
B.
If The
"Basis of The Claim Is Brought Forth, it becomes a critical element in
legal proceedings as the data within the document outlines the specific
facts, pertaining towards the circumstances for what indicated the Claims
Start.
14.
REQUEST SHEET =
A. A "Request
Sheet" Is A Formal Document or Form, used to make a specific request for.
i. Information,
ii. Services,
iii. Resources, Or
iv. Actions.
B. Request Sheets Are
A Structured Means
of communication that help ensure: --
i. Clarity,
ii. Accountability, And,
iii. Proper Documentation,
of the request made and their associated details.
15.
IN REFERENCE TOWARDS =
A. In Reference
Toward Are the Original Files Re-Organised, so any person can easily understand
the information / data contained within. The Police Filed the information /
Data that they archived about the Now Claimant in such a way while
overloading the file in size of magnitude that it criminalises him for no fair
reason or without any fair public interest due to no fair cause.
16.
Break =
A. This is a Spare Template
..
|
|
A
BREAK
DOWN OF THE
EXTERNAL
FILE STRUCTURE
ATTACHED
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
15. FILES: (0.
Claim-Letter-27-08-23)
A.
Folder
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
B.
Folder: (1. Dates-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
C.
Folder: (2.
PNC-Error-Links-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
D.
Folder: (3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 1 of 6:
·
Folder-Path: Folder One: PNC Original Files Folder-Path: Folder One: message-1-65367
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
E.
Folder: (3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 2 of 6:
·
Folder-Path: Folder One: PNC Original Files Folder-Path: message-1-65368
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
F.
Folder: (3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 3 of 6:
·
Folder-Path: Folder One: PNC Original Files Folder-Path: message-1-65369
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
G.
Folder-(3. Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 4 of 6:
Folder-Path: (5. Police-PNC-Record-Emails-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
H.
Folder-(3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 5 of 6:
Folder-Path: (6. Police-PNC-Record-Emails-Additional Files-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
I.
Folder-(3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 6 of 6:
Folder-Path: (1. PNC-Record-Emails-INDEX27-08-23)
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
J.
Folder: (4. PNC-Workout-File-27-08-23
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
K.
Folder: (7. Simulation-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
a. File Explanation:
A
BREAK DOWN OF THE
EXTERNAL FILE STRUCTURE
ATTACHED
...
.
..START
17.
FILES:
A.
Folder: (0.
Claim-Letter-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
1. 1.
Fresh-Claim-against-ACRO-and Otrhers1.docx
2. 1. The-Content-INDEX
-for-the-FreshClaim-File.docx
3. 2.
Glossary-of-Terms-&-Code.docx
a. File Explanation: This file contains a copy of: --
1. This is the Now Claimants Copy of Request & Claim.
2. We developed this File to Help Build This File and keep its
contents even shorter.
3. Our Glossary-of-Terms-&-Code
is included for ease of use as an alphabetical list of Short Term-Words relating to the
data submitted within this document creating for any user a brief
dictionary toolkit for specific subjects, texts, and dialects, with
easy-to-use explanations to manage this document and that of its affiliated
documents.
...
END
...
.
..START
B.
Folder: (1.
Dates-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
1. 1. Dates.docx
a. File Explanation: This file contains a copy of: --
1. This file explains the dates the Now Claimants: Request & Claim arise from.
...
END
...
.
..START
C.
Folder: (2.
PNC-Error-Links-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
1.
1.
PNC-Weblinks.docx =Internet-Style
a. File Explanation: This file contains a copy of: --
1.
The
included file of weblinks, simplify file handling by placing multiple files
large and/or small into a single document and each as single text string
known as a hyperlink.
...
END
...
.
..START
D.
Folder-(3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 1 of 6:
·
Folder-Path: Folder One: PNC Original Files Folder-Path: Folder One: message-1-65367
·
Contents:
1. Info
2. Message-1-65367.Eml
3. PNC_9799378V CORDELL SIMON PAUL.pdf
4. TRACE_TRACE LETTER.pdf
5. 2017 PNC_9799378V CORDELL SIMON PAUL (2).docx
E.
Folder-(3. Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 2 of 6:
·
Folder-Path: Folder One: PNC Original Files Folder-Path: message-1-65368
·
Contents:
1.
Info
2.
Message-1-65368.Eml
3.
PNC_9799378V
CORDELL SIMON PAUL.pdf
4.
TRACE_TRACE
LETTER.pdf
5.
2020 PNC_9799378V CORDELL
SIMON PAUL (2).docx
F.
Folder-(3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 3 of 6:
·
Folder-Path: Folder One: PNC Original Files Folder-Path: message-1-65369
·
Contents:
1. Info
2. Message-1-65369.Eml
3. PNC_9799378V CORDELL SIMON PAUL.pdf
4. TRACE_TRACE LETTER.pdf
5. 2021 PNC_9799378V CORDELL SIMON PAUL (2).docx
a. File Explanation: This file contains a copy of: --
1. PNC Original File: This section contains a subset of the Original Emails. These emails
were exchanged among Government
Officials, the Claimant, his Solicitors, and his support
network. The communication pertains to the rectification of files held by
the police, which are specifically connected to the Claimant's profile
referred to as an Acro Report.
2. Message: Within
this segment is a copy of Our requested Subject Access application
being disclosure to us as one email
out of many sent.
3. PNC: This
section contains replicated copies of the attached correspondences found in
the "Message" emails. These correspondences were exchanged
between the Now Claimant and his Support
Network, and that of Government
Officials.
4. TRACE_TRACE LETTER: Similarly, this part includes duplicated copies of attached
correspondences from the Message
emails exchanged between the Now Claimant and his Support Network, inclusive of relevant Government Officials.
G.
Folder-(3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 4 of 6:
Folder-Path 1: (Police-PNC-Record-Emails-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
1. Police-PNC-Record-Emails.docx =Diary-Style
--
Folder-Path 2:
(Criminal-PNC-ACRO-Record-Emails-30-08-23)
1. 0_RE_Simon Cordell.pdf
2. City-Of-london-Court.pdf
3. Enfield-Court-List.pdf
4. RE_ Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.pdf
5. RE_ Simon Cordell Errors on Cases-01.pdf
--
Folder-Path 3:
(PNC-Emails-Received-&-Sent)
1. Received Folder Number of Files: -- 36
..
2. Sent Folder Number of Files: -- 2
...
--
a. File Explanation-Path 1: This file contains a copy of: --
1. The Police-PNC-Record-Emails
is a compilation of Official Records that We present as Exhibits of
Evidence, which consist of emails that We obtained specifically in
connection with the correction and/or rectification process of this ACRO
Report and then afterwards Organised in a Diary-Style
format.
--
b. File Explanation-Path 2: This file contains a copy of: --
1. The 0_RE_Simon Cordell
file is a copy .
2. The City-Of-London-Court
file is a copy
.
3. The Enfield-Court-List.
file is a copy .
4. The RE_ Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases file is a copy .
5. The RE_ Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases-01 file is a copy .
--
c. File Explanation-Path 3: This file contains a copy of: --
1. The Received Folder Number
of Files file
is a copy .
2. The Sent Folder Number of
Files file
is a copy .
H.
Folder-(3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 5 of 6:
Folder-Path: (Police-PNC-Record-Emails-Additional
Files-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
1.
Additional-Files-For-Errors-on-Pnc-27-08-23.docx=Diary-Style
2.
A
a. File Explanation: This file contains a copy of: --
1. These files contain Additional information that was not filed in
its first versions of development as a drafted document and therefore were
submitted into the file at a later date as they were decided as relevant to
Our Claim and/or inquiry with Requests.
2. A
I.
Folder-(3.
Original-Court-Application-Case-Files-27-08-23) Route 6 of 6:
Folder-Path: (1.PNC-Record-Emails-INDEX27-08-23)
·
Contents:
1.
PNC-Record-Emails-INDEX-27-08-23.docx
=Diary-INDEX -Style
2.
PNC-Record-Emails-INDEX-27-08-23.pdf
a. File Explanation: This file contains a copy of: --
1. A
2. A
...
END
...
.
.START
J.
Folder: (4.
PNC-Workout-File-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
1.
Combined
2017,2020, 2021-WorkOut-Code-4-PNC-27-08-23.docx =PNC Replica-Style
2.
WorkOut-Code-4-PNC-27-08-23.docx
=Alone-Style
3. The-WorkOut-Code-Document Style.docx =Document -Style
a. File Explanation: This file contains a copy of: --
1. The Combined File
is a compilation of Official Records involving the Now Claimants such
as the polices PNC record that they
hold against him and the Addition of his Own Work-Out-Code, The reason for the Combined File Existence is
because when the Now Claimant received a copy of the data the police retain
on him due to requesting the information of the Police he found himself
astonishment by the lack of systematic organization of the files he
received once the police had printed the data out of their computer systems
and or any other system they choose or still choose to use. The received
PNC Record in the year of 2017 spanned
over 80 numerous pages of A4 paper, making it difficult to comprehend and
in turn criminalising the Now Claimant with over a 24.000-page-word-count
creating for him a criminal record of a document. The Now Claimant could
not remember committing crimes whatsoever and finally managed to create the
Combined File to find out if he did do so of what kind. The Now Claimant
found that the More the Combined File was completed the less accurate the
data in the PNC / ACRO Report about him become and as of to the reasons why
it was still contained within left him in upset and disappointment as it
truly shows how the police have abused and branded him all of his life
since meeting or knowing of him and
this is in part of the reason to why the Now Claimant has simplified
and improved its clarity by introducing a workflow code, enhancing the
presentation of the accurate information. This compiled and enhanced file
is Now Named as the Combined File.
2. In Brief: This
document serves as the Work-Out-Code.
Its purpose is to
transform the information from the Polices Acro Report into a
comprehensible table. This table elucidates the ultimate verdict of the
police regarding the case they lodged against the Now Claimant.
Additionally, it includes details about any wrongfully imposed bail
conditions or police endorsements such as punishments or penalty fines the
Now Claimant underwent.
3. In Short Text: The Workout-Code Document
Style.docx file is the Work Out Table but transferred
into a word document due to the table not being visible for more input as
necessary!
...
END
...
.
..START
K.
Folder: (7.
Simulation-27-08-23)
·
Contents:
1.
(1)
Police-PNC-Record-this-Goes-with-the- Combined -File.docx
2.
(1)
Police-PNC-Record-this-Goes-with-the- Combined -File.pdf
3.
(1)
Police PNC Record this Goes with the Combined File.htm
a. File Explanation: This file contains a copy of: --
1. This file contains a copy of an Index
that can be used to manage the PNC
Simulation. The PNC
Simulation. Corresponding Correspondence have also been
placed in a systematic chronological order for ease of use.
2. Our Simulation, in short, is a
representation or imitation of a real-world situation using Newspaper
Articles, Telephone Calls, Telephone Texts, Hand Typed & Computer Wrote
Notes, Court Applications, Letters, Videos, Victim Statements and Witness
Statements and other materials alike. It is the Our tool to be used to
observe, analyse, or predict how the real elements of this scenario become
a Claim for the Now Claimant.
3. This file is the same as the Simulation, but
in a different formant.
...
END
|
|
WHAT
THIS DOCUMENT PROVES
OUR
LISTED AS ACCUSED
TO
BE LIABLE FOR!
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. WHAT THIS DOCUMENT
PROVES THE POLICE TO BE LIABLE FOR:
A.
Breach of Data Protection
Laws
.
.
......
3
B.
Violation of Human Rights
.
...
...................
.
3
C.
Legal Accountability
.
.
...
....................
.
3
D.
Homicide in the UK
.
.
...
.........
.
3
E.
Accountability for Police
Actions.
.
.
...
.
...
3
F. Upholding
Legal and Ethical Standards.
.
...
...
.........
.
3
WHAT
THIS DOCUMENT PROVES
OUR
LISTED AS ACCUSED
TO
BE LIABLE FOR!
19.
WHAT THIS DOCUMENT PROVES:
A. Breach of Data Protection Laws: This
document substantiates claims of breaches of data protection laws by law
enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom. It outlines instances where
personal data may have been mishandled, leading to potential violations of
data protection regulations, such as the Data Protection Act 2018 and GDPR.
B. Violation of Human Rights: The document also
highlights concerns related to the violation of human rights by the police.
It emphasizes specific rights, including the right to life, right to
liberty and security, right to a fair trial, and freedom from torture and
degrading treatment, which may have been compromised due to police actions.
D. Legal Accountability: In addition to data
protection and human rights violations, this document underscores potential
legal accountability on the part of the police. It points to situations
where the police may be held liable for their actions, especially in cases
involving unlawful arrests, malicious allegations, or failure to uphold
legal standards.
C. Homicide in the UK: While not explicitly
detailed in this document, it may be relevant to mention that homicide
cases in the UK are subject to rigorous legal scrutiny and investigations
to ensure justice is served. Any allegations of misconduct or negligence in
homicide cases warrant thorough examination.
E. Accountability for Police Actions: This
section emphasizes the need for police accountability regarding their
actions. It underscores the importance of holding law enforcement agencies
responsible for their conduct, especially when it affects individuals'
rights and well-being.
D.
Upholding
Legal and Ethical Standards: Lastly, this document
serves as a call to uphold legal and ethical standards in policing. It
stresses the significance of maintaining the highest levels of integrity,
fairness, and respect for human rights within the law enforcement
community.
|
|
RECOVERY OF THE CLAIMANTS LOSSES
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2. Police Arrests:
A. ****************
..
.
.
...
.........
3
3. Police NFA Number:
A. ****************
..
.
.
...
.........
3
4. Bail Dates
Pertaining Towards NFA:
A. ****************
..
.
.
...
.........
3
5. Total arrest in
2012:
A. ****************
..
.
.
...
.........
3
6. Total arrest in
2013:
A. ****************
..
.
.
...
.........
3
7. Total arrest in
2014:
A. ****************
..
.
.
...
.........
3
c)
Losses and Special Payments:
Comprehensive Guidelines for Handling Losses in
Accordance with the Compensation Act
2006 and Special Payments, Including Delegation of Limits and Reporting
Obligations to the Department, External Auditor, and Police, as Prescribed
by the Act; Unfortunately, Government Company Officials Failed to
Adequately Assist Mr. S. P. Cordell with his Concerns.
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide updated
instructions and guidelines related to the proper handling of losses and
special payments within our company. It is essential that all employees are
familiar with and adhere to these guidelines, as failure to do so may
result in legal and financial consequences for the company and its
personnel.
1/
Compliance with the Compensation Act 2006:
All employees
must strictly comply with the provisions set forth in the Compensation Act 2006
while managing losses and special payments within the company. The Act
mandates certain procedures and reporting requirements aimed at ensuring
transparency, fairness, and accountability.
2/
Delegation of Limits:
To ensure
efficient handling of losses and special payments, the company has
established limits for different levels of management. It is crucial to
adhere to these limits and seek appropriate authorization when necessary.
Failure to comply with these limits may jeopardize the company's financial
stability and reputation.
3/
Reporting Obligations:
In some
circumstances, losses and special payments must be reported to relevant
authorities, including the Department, External Auditor, and Police, as
required by the Act. It is the responsibility of the responsible personnel
to promptly report such incidents and provide all necessary information to
the appropriate parties.
Regrettably, in the case of Mr. S. P. Cordell, government
company officials failed to adequately assist him with his concerns. This
failure to provide the necessary support not only infringes upon Mr.
Cordell's rights but also reflects a breach of our own commitment to
compliance and customer service. Therefore, it is imperative that all
employees recognize the importance of promptly addressing customer concerns
and ensuring proper assistance is provided in accordance with company
policies and legal obligations.
In conclusion, adherence to the guidelines outlined in
this memorandum is essential for successfully managing losses and special
payments within our companies. It is crucial that all employees familiarize
themselves with the provisions of The
Compensation Act 2006, adhere to delegation limits,
and fulfil their reporting obligations. By doing so, we can maintain the
highest standards of compliance and ensure that instances such as Mr.
Cordell's experience do not recur.
RECOVERY
OF THE CLAIMANTS LOSSES
Question
·
IF employees of The Police and Local Council as
well as Neighbourhood Watch Teams companys all commit a crime in knowing
so together against a member of the pubic and then get caught if the member
of public who is then on a victim takes a significant finical loss how do
the companies split the recovery of costs.
·
When employees of the police, local council,
and neighbourhood watch organizations commit a crime together against a
member of the public and are caught, the recovery of costs for any
financial losses incurred by the victim can be a complex matter.
·
It typically involves legal procedures and may
vary based on the specific circumstances and jurisdiction.
·
Here's
a general overview of how the recovery of costs might be handled:
1) Legal Proceedings: The victim of the crime can pursue legal
action against the individuals involved, as well as their respective
employers (police, local council, neighbourhood watch). This may
involve filing civil lawsuits or claims for damages.
2) Civil Lawsuits: The victim may file a civil lawsuit against
the individuals responsible for the crime. If it can be proven that these
individuals were acting within the scope of their employment or duties,
their employers (police, local council, neighbourhood watch) could
potentially be held vicariously liable for their actions.
3) Insurance: Government entities like local councils often
have liability insurance to cover claims arising from the actions of their
employees. In cases where employees are found liable for a crime, the
insurance policies of their employers may come into play to cover some or
all of the victim's financial losses.
4) Settlements: Parties involved, including the victim, the
employees, and their employers, may negotiate settlements to avoid
protracted legal proceedings. These settlements can specify how costs are
divided among the parties.
5) Criminal Restitution: In some cases, if the
employees are convicted of a crime, the court may order them to pay
restitution to the victim. This would be a separate process from civil
litigation.
6) Contributory Negligence: The legal principle of
contributory negligence might be considered. If the victim is found to have
contributed to their own losses in any way, this could affect the
allocation of costs.
7) Government Immunity: It's important to
note that government entities often have certain immunities from lawsuits,
and there may be limitations on the number of damages they can be held responsible for.
These immunities vary by jurisdiction.
8)
Legal
Advice: Both the victim and the employees involved
should seek legal advice from qualified attorneys to understand their
rights, responsibilities, and potential liabilities in this complex
situation.
·
Ultimately, the specific outcome will depend on
the details of the case, applicable laws, and legal proceedings. It's
essential for all parties involved to consult legal professionals to
navigate this situation appropriately.
If A
Judge Agrees a Large Settlement How Do the Company Split the Cost
·
When a judge agrees to a large settlement in a
legal case involving multiple defendants, such as the police, local
council, and neighbourhood watch
companies, the allocation of the settlement costs typically depends on
various factors.
·
Here's
how it generally works:
1) Allocation by Liability: The judge may allocate
the settlement costs based on the degree of liability or fault attributed
to each defendant. This means that each defendant pays a portion of the
settlement in proportion to their level of responsibility for the victim's
damages.
2) Contributory Negligence: If the victim is
found to have contributed to their own losses through negligence or other
factors, the judge may consider this when allocating the settlement costs.
In some cases, the victim's compensation may be reduced to account for
their contribution to the incident.
3) Insurance Coverage: Defendants, such as
the local council and neighbourhood watch companies, may have liability
insurance policies that cover legal settlements. In such cases, their
insurance providers may be responsible for covering a significant portion
of the settlement costs.
4) Government Immunity: Government entities
like the police and local council may have certain immunities and
limitations on the damages they can be held responsible for. The judge will
consider these factors when determining their share of the settlement.
5) Negotiated Agreements: Prior to a judge's
decision, the parties involved (the victim, defendants, and their insurers)
may negotiate and reach agreements on how to split the settlement costs.
These negotiated agreements can then be presented to the judge for
approval.
6) Court's Decision: Ultimately, the judge has the authority to make
the final decision on the allocation of settlement costs. The judge will
review the evidence, arguments, and any negotiated agreements to determine
a fair distribution of liability among the defendants.
7) Payment by Defendants: Once the allocation
is determined, each defendant is responsible for paying their respective
share of the settlement. This payment can come from their own resources,
insurance coverage, or other sources.
·
It's important to note that the specific
process and factors involved may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the
details of the case. Legal professionals representing all parties involved
will play a crucial role in presenting arguments and evidence related to
liability and settlement allocation.
·
In complex cases with multiple defendants, it's
common for settlements to be structured in a way that reflects the level of
responsibility of each party. Legal experts, including attorneys and
insurance adjusters, often work together to negotiate and determine a fair
distribution of costs.
To calculate how much 50 million would be split
per day over 8 years, you would first need to find the total number of days
in 8 years and then divide 50 million by that number. Here's the
calculation: --
1)
Number of days in 8 years: 8 years x 365
days/year = 2,920 days
2)
Now, divide 50 million by the number of days:
3)
50,000,000 / 2,920 = 17,123.29 (approximately)
4)
So, if you were to split 50 million evenly over
8 years, it would be approximately 17,123.29 per day.
Whats 17.123.29 divided by 4.
1)
To divide 17,123.29 by 4, you simply perform
the division:
2)
17,123.29 / 4 = 4,280.8225
3)
So, 17,123.29 divided by 4 is approximately
4,280.8225.
Please Calculate How Much 50 million
Would Be Split Per Day Over 27 Years and Then Afterwards Divide That By 4
Please?
first,
lets calculate how much 50 million would be split per day over 27 years.
there are approximately 365.25
days in a year, accounting for leap years. so, 27 years would be
approximately 27 * 365.25 = 9861.75 days.
so, 50 million split
over 27 years would be:
50,000,000 pounds / 9861.75 days
= approximately 5070.31 pounds/day
now, lets divide that amount by
4:
5070.31 pounds/day / 4 =
approximately 1267.58 pounds/day.
so, if 50 million pounds were
split evenly over 27 years and then divided by 4, each portion would be
approximately 1267.58
pounds per day.
20. Police Arrests:
21. Police NFA Number :
22. Bail Dates
Pertaining Towards NFA:
23. Total arrest in
2012:
24. Total arrest in
2013:
25. Total arrest in
2014:
1
years just for Asbo
·
General
Damages = General
Damages Relating Towards the Impact Within the Claimants Life Referring to
Such Issues As: --
- Pain And Suffering Caused by Our Listed as Liable Within
This Official Document,
b.
Forced Changes to The
Claimants Lifestyle,
c.
Mental Trauma Also
Caused by The Mentioned in This Data,
Ψ And: --
·
Special
Damages = Special
Damages Relate to The Impact caused by Our Listed
as Liable within this Official Document to the Now
Claimants Life Referring to Such Issues As: --
a.
Loss Of Earnings,
b.
Future Loss of
Earnings,
c.
Medical Treatment,
d.
Future Medical
Treatments,
e.
Transport Expenses
Relating to Incidents as Below,
f.
Changes To the Now
Claimants Living Environment.
To calculate the loss per day for each category with a currency value and
text, you need to follow these steps:
- Determine the Total Loss Value: Calculate the total loss value for each category. This would
involve adding up all the expenses or damages associated with that
category. For example, for General Damages, you would calculate the
total value of pain and suffering, forced lifestyle changes, mental
trauma, etc. For Special Damages, you would calculate the total value
of loss of earnings, medical treatments, transportation expenses, and
changes to the living environment.
- Calculate the Duration:
Determine the duration or time period over which these damages
occurred or are expected to occur. This is the timeframe for which you
want to calculate the loss per day.
- Calculate Loss Per Day:
Divide the total loss value for each category by the number of days in
the specified duration. This will give you the loss per day. Make sure
to include both the currency value and a clear text description of
what this loss per day represents.
Here's a breakdown for each
category:
General Damages:
- Calculate
the total value of pain and suffering, forced lifestyle changes,
mental trauma, etc.
- Determine
the duration over which these damages occurred or are expected to
occur.
- Divide the
total value by the number of days to calculate the loss per day.
- Express the
loss per day in currency value (e.g., USD) and provide a clear text
description.
Example: "General Damages:
The total value of pain, suffering, and mental trauma is $10,000 over a
period of 100 days, resulting in a loss of $100 per day."
Special Damages:
- Calculate
the total value of loss of earnings, medical treatments,
transportation expenses, changes to the living environment, etc.
- Determine
the duration over which these damages occurred or are expected to
occur.
- Divide the
total value by the number of days to calculate the loss per day.
- Express the
loss per day in currency value (e.g., USD) and provide a clear text
description.
Example: "Special Damages:
The total value of loss of earnings, medical treatments, and transportation
expenses is $20,000 over a period of 200 days, resulting in a loss of $100
per day."
Repeat these
steps for each category, ensuring that you have a clear calculation of the
loss per day with both currency value and explanatory text.
1/
As per my records the amount
for the reimbursement comes to £.
(amount).
- Recovery
of Expenses and/or Legal Fees
2/
As per my records the amount
for the reimbursement comes to £.
(amount).
3/
The Below listed is the
additional miscellaneous expenditure occurred by the Now Claimant caused as
loss due to the ongoings within this claim and these specifics include
receipts and bank transactions of purchase that are herewith attached and
requested as recovered.
4/
As per my records the amount
for the reimbursement comes to £.
(amount).
a) The
Now Claimant Sums of losses Create due to the Enfield Council
create a total of the following: -
b) Total
Amount we requested as paid is. £
c) We
request the Enfield Council to release the sums
of loss as they are legally liable to pay for in respect of the
damages caused to the Now Claimant.
d) We
are looking forward to a prompt response from the Enfield Council so
to be able to put right to right and an end to
these proceedings.
e) Thanking
you for your time.
f) If you have any questions, please feel free to
contact us directly on the details below and we are looking forward to your
response.
Yours
sincerely,
- An additional Legal Consent Form.
5/
We have added a legal consent form below for the
Now Claimants Mother a Ms Lorraine Cordell to have the legal consent to
address these ongoing issues at any time of day.
- Signature: -
- Signature: -
6/
Mr.
Simon Paul Cordell
109 Burncroft Avenue
Enfield
London
EN3 7JQ
7/
Re_Wired@ymail.com
8/
This Information is up to
date on the Enfield Councils Databases.
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
BITS
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
16. THE DEFINITIONS OF
OUR GLOSSARY OF TERMS TABLE ONE: --
A. Table
One
.
.
.
.
...
.........
.
3
17. THE DEFINITIONS OF
OUR GLOSSARY OF TERMS TABLE TWO: --
B. Table
Two
.
.
.
.
...
.........
.
3
18. THE DEFINITIONS OF
OUR GLOSSARY OF TERMS TABLE THREE: --
C. Table
Three
.
.
.
.
...
.........
3
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
26. THE DEFINITIONS OF
OUR GLOSSARY OF TERMS TABLE ONE: --
|
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS
Table
One
|
|
|
Nub
|
Term
|
Definitions
|
|
|
1)
|
Case Number CN1
|
·
Definition: A unique number
assigned by the court to track and retrieve a case. It identifies the
case's location and filing date.
|
|
|
2)
|
1) Time Spent TS1
OR
2)
Removal of Spent Convictions RSC1
|
·
Definition: Refers to spent
convictions, which are convictions that become disregarded over time,
according to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974.
|
|
|
3)
|
Time Suffered (TS2
|
·
Definition: Describes the
physical or mental pain experienced, particularly in the context of
Article 3 rights.
|
|
|
4)
|
Accused WON AW1
OR COPFS1
|
·
Definition: Indicates that
the accused person won the case, suggesting their innocence or lack of
proof by the prosecuting team.
|
|
|
5)
|
Accused LOST AW1 OR COPFS0
|
·
Definition: Implies the
accused was found guilty or liable for a wrongdoing.
|
|
|
6)
|
Yes Bail Condition
Imposed YBCI
|
·
Definition: Signifies that
bail conditions were applied, which can include residence, curfew, or
other restrictions.
|
|
|
7)
|
No Bail Condition Imposed NBCI
|
·
Definition: Denotes freedom
from bail conditions.
|
|
|
8)
|
Request for Review RFR
|
·
Definition: A request for a
review of an investigation, often related to alleged misconduct.
|
|
|
9)
|
Disposal History DH1
|
·
Definition: Removal of
information from local police systems, justified through a review
process.
|
|
|
10)
|
Disposal (Caution) DC1
|
·
Definition: Refers to adult
police cautions, a way to resolve minor criminal allegations without
going to court.
|
|
|
11)
|
Disposal (Court) DC2
|
·
Definition: Outlines
out-of-court disposals for low-level offenses, avoiding court
proceedings.
|
|
|
12)
|
Disposal (Penalty Notice) DPN1
|
·
Definition: Explains Penalty
Notices for Disorder (PND) for low-level offenses, available to
individuals over 18.
|
|
|
13)
|
Disposal NFA NFA1 or N/a
|
·
Definition: Signifies a
"No Further Action" decision by the police when there's
insufficient evidence or it's not in the public interest to charge
someone.
|
|
|
14)
|
Request for Compensation RFC1
|
·
Definition: A claim for
compensation from the police for accidental or unlawful actions.
|
|
|
15)
|
Special Circumstances SC1
|
·
Definition: Situations
requiring special attention or consideration due to their unique nature.
|
|
|
16)
|
Mitigating Circumstance MC1
|
·
Definition: Factors like
age, mental state, or lack of criminal record that reduce a person's
culpability in court.
|
|
|
17)
|
Extenuating Circumstance EC1
|
·
Definition: Temporary
difficulties or problems, such as medical issues, affecting an
individual.
|
|
|
18)
|
Exceptional Circumstances EC2
|
·
Definition: Events that
negatively impact an individual's ability to meet obligations, which were
unforeseeable and beyond their control.
|
|
|
19)
|
Extraordinary Circumstances EOSC1
|
·
Definition: Unusual and
unexpected situations that couldn't be predicted or prepared for using
normal measures.
|
|
|
20)
|
Unusual Circumstances UC1
|
·
Definition: Uncommon, rare,
or sudden events causing a failure to act as required.
|
|
|
21)
|
National Systems Deletion NSD1
|
·
Definition: Deletion of
records from national police systems, often related to non-convictions or
unproven allegations.
|
|
|
22)
|
PNC Record Amendments PRA1
|
·
Definition: Changes made to
the Police National Computer (PNC) database, a central source of
information for law enforcement agencies.
|
|
|
23)
|
Local Systems Deletion LSD1
|
·
Definition: Guidelines for
deleting records from local police systems.
|
|
|
24)
|
Our Listed as Liable OLAL1
|
·
Definition: Lists
individuals legally responsible or accountable for their actions in
pursuit of a claimant.
|
|
|
25)
|
Local Systems - Amendment of Information
Contained Within AOICW1
|
·
Definition: Application to
amend information in a police force's information system.
|
|
|
26)
|
|
|
|
|
END
|
27. THE DEFINITIONS OF GLOSSARY OF TERMS TWO: --
|
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS
Table
Two
|
|
|
Nub
|
Term
|
Definitions
|
|
|
1)
|
Adequate NOT-ADEQ
|
·
Definition: Personal data is
sufficient or satisfactory in quality or quantity for a specific purpose.
|
|
|
2)
|
Relevant R1
|
·
Definition: Data directly
connected or applicable to a specific topic, situation, or context,
making it important.
|
|
|
3)
|
Limited L1
|
·
Definition: Restricts data
processing to what is necessary for its intended purposes.
|
|
|
4)
|
Accurate DEL1
|
·
Definition: Data is correct
and free from errors.
|
|
|
5)
|
Up to Date NOT-UTD1
|
·
Definition: Data is kept
current when necessary.
|
|
|
6)
|
Non-Realistic Prospect of Conviction NPC1
|
·
Definition: Deciding it's
not in the public interest to retain a record of a caution due to the low
likelihood of a conviction.
|
|
|
7)
|
Unlawfully Arrest UA1
|
·
Definition: When a person is
unlawfully arrested by the police.
|
|
|
8)
|
Malicious Allegation MA1
|
·
Definition: An arrest
resulting from a malicious false accusation.
|
|
|
9)
|
Not Been Updated NBU1
|
·
Definition: A prosecution
incorrectly showing as impending when it has been resolved.
|
|
|
10)
|
|
|
|
|
END
|
28. THE DEFINITIONS OF GLOSSARY OF TERMS THREE: --
|
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS
Table
Three
|
|
|
Nub
|
Term
|
Definitions
|
|
|
1)
|
Accused
|
·
Definition: One charged with
wrongdoing, especially the defendant in a criminal case.
|
|
|
2)
|
Police National Computer PNC
|
·
Definition: A centralized
database used by law enforcement agencies for information concerning
individuals, property, and vehicles.
|
|
|
3)
|
Data Controller DC
|
·
Definition: An entity
responsible for determining the purposes and means of personal data
processing.
|
|
|
4)
|
Authorised Professional Practice APP
|
·
Definition: Guidelines
approved for professional practices in policing.
|
|
|
5)
|
Occurrence Enquiry Log OEL
|
·
Definition: A record of
inquiries made during investigations.
|
|
|
6)
|
All Managers/Supervisors/Staff AMSS1
|
·
Definition: Refers to all
individuals in management, supervisory, or staff roles.
|
|
|
7)
|
The Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA)
|
·
Definition: The governing
body overseeing the Metropolitan Police Service in London.
|
|
|
8)
|
PNC Fingerprints and DNA BI1
|
·
Definition: Biometric
information that includes fingerprints and DNA, considered important by
government officials.
|
|
|
9)
|
Met Contact Centre Met CC
|
·
Definition: METCC, also
known as the Met Contact Centre, Met Command and Control or MO12, is a
department of Met Operations within Greater London's Metropolitan Police
Service.
|
|
|
10)
|
|
·
|
|
|
END
|
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS 2
BITS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
19. GLOSSARY OF TERMS =
A.
Glossary of Terms Is a Specialized Reference Tool
.
.
...
......
3
B.
Its Purpose Is to Help Readers
.
.
...
...
.
...
.
3
C. Our Waver
.
.
...
...
...
...
3
29.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS =
A. A Glossary of Terms
Is a Specialized
Reference Tool: -- or section within a document, i.e. This Document! Or other material object such as: --
i. Textbooks,
ii. Technical Manuals,
iii. Dictionaries,
iv. Encyclopaedias,
v. Academic Journals,
vi. Training Materials,
vii. Legal Documents,
viii. Government Publications,
ix. Healthcare Materials,
x. Scientific Papers,
xi. Computer Software Manuals,
xii. User Guides,
xiii. Educational Websites,
xiv. Museum Exhibits,
xv. Legal Texts,
xvi. Glossary Books,
that provides concise and clear definitions or
explanations for key words, phrases, or technical terms used within the
content of the material object .
B.
Its Purpose Is to Help Readers: -- understand and interpret the
terminology specific to the subjected matter of relevance.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
5. THIS DOCUMENTS AIM: --
A.
To
Ensure United
Kingdom Claimants Legal Rights Stay.
.
..
3
B.
To
Use My Abilities Ingrained in Me as A United Kingdom Citizen To.
.
3
C.
To
Uphold the Ease-of-Use In.
.
......
.........
3
6. THIS DOCUMENTS
APPLICABILITY:
--
A.
All
Representatives of The Police That Being Inclusive of Their Police
Officers, Public Servants, And Any Other Staff Such As
......
.........
...
3
7. THIS DOCUMENTS LEGAL
BASIS AND DRIVING FORCE:
--
A. A Morden
United Kingdom.
.
......
.........
...
3
B. Data
Protection Act 2018.
.
......
................
3
C. General
Data Protection Regulations.
.
......
.
3
8. RELATED POLICIES,
PROCEDURES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS: --
A.
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
.
......
...
3
B.
Data Protection Act 2018.
.
......
.........
...
3
C.
The Privacy and Electronic Communications
Regulations (PECR).
3
D.
The Network and Information Systems Regulations
2018 (NIS Regulations)
.
3
E.
The Investigatory Powers Act 2016.
.
......
.........
...........
3
F.
The Freedom of Information Act 2000.
.
......
......................
3
G.
The Environmental Information Regulations 2004.
.
......
.......
3
H.
The Human Rights Act 1998.
.
......
.........
.
3
I.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) Codes
of Practice.
.
...........
3
J. The UK Data Protection Authority
(Information Commissioner's Office)
3
TIME
LIMIT
BITS
As
a Start
TABLE OF CONTENTS
20. TIME LIMITS
A.
Police Time Limits
.
.
...
....
.
.
...
.
3
B.
Time Limits as Safeguards
.
.
...
.......
......
.
3
C.
The Claimants Time Limits
.
...
....
.
...
.
3
D.
Special Circumstances
.
.
...
....
.
.
...
.
3
E.
Mitigating Circumstances
.
.
...
....
.
.
...
.
3
F.
Our Comprehensive Explanation of Time Limits
.
....
.
.
...
.
3
G.
Police Time Limits
.
.
...
....
.
.
...
.
3
H.
Police Time Limits
.
.
...
....
.
.
...
.
3
I.
Police Time Limits
.
.
...
....
.
.
...
.
3
J. Police Time Limits
.
.
...
....
.
.
...
.
3
SPECIAL
CIRCUMSTANCES
- Understanding
Special Circumstances
.
....
.
.
...
...
.
3
- Tailored
Responses
.
...
....
...
.
...
...
.
3
REMOVING
SPENT CONVICTIONS
- The Removal of Spent Convictions
😊
.
Updated 16-11-23...Read after
Index then start.
3
GLOSSARY OF TERMS 2
|
RELATED POLICIES,
PROCEDURES
AND
OTHER DOCUMENTS
33. RELATED
POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS: --
A.
The Niche RMS
Minimum Data Quality Standards, Information Management Policy, Records
Management Policy are: -- defined as a set of guidelines and rules that
outline the required standards for maintaining accurate and organized
data within the Niche RMS system. This policy focuses on ensuring
high-quality information management and effective records management
practices.
A.
General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR):
Although
it is an EU regulation, GDPR has direct relevance in the UK. It sets the
framework for data protection, including the rights of data subjects and
the responsibilities of data controllers and processors.
B.
Data Protection
Act 2018: This act
supplements the GDPR and provides specific provisions for how Government
officials implemented data
protection in the UK. It includes exemptions and derogations for certain
areas, such as law enforcement and national security.
C.
The Privacy and
Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR): These
regulations cover electronic marketing communications, including email
marketing and the use of cookies. PECR works alongside GDPR and the Data
Protection Act 2018.
D.
The Network and
Information Systems Regulations 2018 (NIS Regulations): Regulations are
set in place to focus on the security of network and information systems.
They require operators of essential services and digital service
providers to implement appropriate security measures.
E.
The Investigatory
Powers Act 2016: Often referred
to as the "Snooper's Charter," this act regulates surveillance
and the interception of communications in the UK. It has implications for
data privacy and protection.
F.
The Freedom of
Information Act 2000: This act
provides public access to information held by public authorities, which
includes the right to access personal data held by government bodies.
G.
The Environmental
Information Regulations 2004: The 2004
regulations provide access to environmental information held by Local authorities and they are related to data protection in
the context of environmental data.
A. The
Human Rights Act 1998: While not
specific to data protection, this act incorporates the European
Convention on Human Rights into UK law, including the right to respect
for private and family life (Article 8), which has implications for data
protection.
B. The
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) Codes of Practice:
The
ICO issues various codes of practice that provide guidance on specific
aspects of data protection compliance, such as data sharing, direct
marketing, and data protection impact assessments.
C. The
UK Data Protection Authority (Information Commissioner's Office): The ICO is the
UK's independent regulator for data protection. It enforces data
protection laws and provides guidance and resources for organizations and
individuals regarding data protection.
|
TIME LIMITS
·
Police Time Limits
This section delves into the time
limits imposed by the police across various aspects of the legal system. It
emphasizes the critical role these limits play in ensuring fair and
effective investigations.
- Police Time Limits
1) Allow Our Government to ensure that they as a government can Review and Conduct investigations
fairly in respect of us who are their Citizens Legal Rights in a Fair,
while Effective Manner, so that each Citizens Individuals' Rights are
Courtesy Respected as Equal.
·
Time Limits as Safeguards
Highlighting the importance of police
time limits as safeguards, this section aims to protect citizen rights,
ensure the efficiency of government enforcement agencies, and maintain
accountability in legal disputes. It underscores the role of time limits in
standardization and fairness.
- The
Importance of Police Time Limits as Safeguards:
I. Protection of Citizen Rights: These time
limits safeguard the rights of UK citizens, ensuring fair and lawful
treatment within the legal system.
II. Efficiency of Government Enforcement Agencies: Time
limits help maintain the efficiency of government enforcement agencies by
streamlining their workflows.
III. Accountability in Legal Disputes: These
limits play a critical role in ensuring accountability and due process,
holding authorities responsible for adhering to legal timelines.
- Standardization
and Fairness: --
1)
These time limits
create a high standard for all Enforcement Agency Case Handlers, ensuring
that legal decisions are consistent across various processes and
investigations.
- Protecting
Rights: --
1)
These time limits are
vital in upholding the rights of UK citizens, ensuring the efficiency of
government enforcement agencies, and maintaining due process.
·
The Claimants Time Limits
In this section, we address
exceptional circumstances that may impact time limits concerning specific
claims. We enumerate a substantial number of reasons and underscore the
importance of understanding these limits within the context of the claim.
34. EXCEPTIONAL
CIRCUMSTANCES PERTAINING TO ANY TIME LIMIT THAT MAY BE DRAWN TO A REFERENCE
IN RESPECT OF THIS CLAIM: --
A. We enumerate a substantial number of
different reasons and address the issue of Time Limits. within this Claim. As of the date of writing this
document, which is 29/08/2023,
it is our strong belief, backed by comprehensive research on the World-Wide-Internet that the United Kingdom's Government
indeed, regulates and monitors, numerous Laws
& Standards" encompassing various Time Limits." These Time Limits are attached to
diverse Laws and Standards, and the United Kingdom's Government enforces
these boundaries across a broad spectrum of scenarios. These enforcement
actions span from Criminal Law
to Civil Law, and
even extend to Minor Penalty
Offences. In light of these reasons, we will elaborate on
these aspects in greater a detail below: --
1.
For
Example, one: The Legal Right to Erasure under the European Convention of Human Rights does not
specify a Time Limits for erasing data from
a UK ACRO Association of Chief Police
Officers Criminal Records Office Report.
2.
For
Example, two: In situations where a Criminal Aspect arises
during an interaction involving a United Kingdom Citizen or Resident and an
Official Persons, due to a Government Official's fault, whether deliberate
or not, the affected Citizen or Resident might decide to become a Claimant
against the accused.
3.
For
Example, three: When an individual needs to disclose their
Criminal Records for purposes such as Employment, there Exists a Time Limits known as Spent Convictions.
Due to the mentioned already reason
it is crucial for the recipient of these artifacts to become aware of
following:
·
Special Circumstances
Special circumstances refer to
factors that deviate from ordinary conditions and can significantly impact
a situation. This section outlines various special circumstances and their
relevance to time limits. Topics covered include emergency situations,
legal exceptions, humanitarian considerations, and national security.
35.
SPECIAL
CIRCUMSTANCES
A.
The time it took to apply and subsequently
receive the necessary data from the government computer systems.
A. Special Circumstances refer to
factors that deviate from the ordinary or typical conditions and can
significantly impact a situation. These factors are unique or exceptional
in nature and are taken into consideration when assessing a specific case.
Special circumstances can encompass various aspects, such as: --
i. Emergency Situations,
ii. Legal Exceptions,
iii. Humanitarian Considerations,
iv. National Security,
v. Medical Emergencies,
vi. Public Health Crises,
vii. Acts of God,
viii. Technological Advancements,
B. Special circumstances are typically
characterized by their deviation from the norm and the need for tailored
responses or considerations. They may require legal, policy, or
administrative adjustments to address the specific challenges they pose.
·
Mitigating Circumstances
Mitigating circumstances are factors
that may reduce the severity or consequences of a situation. Here, we
highlight different mitigating circumstances and explore how they can
influence legal decisions.
B.
Mitigating
circumstances refer to factors that may reduce the severity or consequences
of a situations,
such as: --
i. Mitigating circumstances,
ii. Mental Health,
iii. Cooperation with Authorities,
iv. Lack of Criminal History,
v. Remorse and Accountability,
vi. Age and Immaturity,
vii. Provocation or Self-Defence,
viii. Adverse Life Circumstances,
ix. Restitution.
C.
Mitigating circumstances are evaluated on a
case-by-case basis and can influence legal decisions, including sentencing
and penalties. They aim to ensure that justice is fair and considers the
individual circumstances of each case.
·
Our Comprehensive Explanation of
Time Limits
This section provides a thorough
explanation of time limits according to UK law. We delve into the
significance of the Offenders Act 1974 and the Limitation Act 1980, which
govern time limits in both civil and criminal law contexts.
- Time
Limits Walkin Info: --
1)
In this section, we
will delve into two significant aspects of UK law, namely the Offenders Act 1974 and The Limitation Act 1980.
- The Significance of These
Laws:
2)
Both the Offenders Act 1974 and The Limitation Act 1980 serve
as crucial legal frameworks governing time limits within both civil and
criminal law contexts. These laws impose statutory time restrictions on UK
Law Enforcement Agencies, covering various aspects of the legal system,
such as:
·
Police Time Limits in Civil Law
Focusing on civil law enforcement,
this section covers time limits related to prompt evidence disclosure and
the protection of human rights.
- Disclosure: --
1)
Law enforcement
agencies are legally obligated to promptly disclose relevant evidence to
the defence. Failing to do so can lead to delays and potential legal
consequences for cases.
- Human Rights Act 1998: --
2)
This act integrates
the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, ensuring that
individuals do not face unreasonable delays in the criminal justice
process, upholding the right to a fair and timely trial.
·
Police Time Limits in Criminal
Law
Here, we explore various time limits
applicable to the criminal law process. Topics include detention time
limits and the timely execution of search warrants. We also emphasize the
importance of timely evidence disclosure and proper interview recording.
- Criminal
Law Aspects: --
1)
Within the realm of
criminal law, various time limits apply to different stages of the legal
process, including:
I. Detention Time Limits: Under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE),
individuals can be detained without charge for up to 24 hours. This period
can extend to 36 hours with authorization from a senior officer and up to
96 hours with judicial approval.
II. Search Warrant Execution: Time limits apply to
the execution of search warrants to ensure efficient and lawful
investigations.
III. Arrests, Filing Charges: Police generally have
a maximum of 24 hours after an arrest to either charge the individual,
release them, or request an extension of detention.
IV. Release of Evidence: Timely disclosure of
evidence is essential for fair trials and legal proceedings.
V. Recording Interviews: While there are no
specific time limits for conducting interviews, prompt interviews are
conducted with consideration for the welfare of those involved.
VI. Investigation Time: The duration of a
police investigation varies widely depending on case complexity, with no
fixed time limits.
VII. Review and Scrutiny: The Crown Prosecution
Service (CPS) may review cases at different investigation and prosecution
stages. While there are no set time limits, timely reviews are essential
for efficient legal processes.
VIII. Criminal Procedure Rules: These rules guide
criminal cases and include time limits for various court process stages,
such as document service and application submissions. These limits vary
based on specific case circumstances.
·
Differences and Examples
This section provides illustrative
examples to highlight the differences in time limits. Scenarios discussed
include the erasure of data from criminal records, situations where
individuals may become claimants against government officials, and the time
limits for disclosing criminal records for employment purposes.
2
For
Example, One: --
I. The European Convention of Human Rights
does not specify a Time Limit
for erasing data from a UK ACRO
Association of Chief Police Officers Criminal Records Office Report.
3
For
Example, Two:
I. In situations where a
Criminal Aspect arises due to Government Officials' actions, the affected
individual may become a Claimant against the accused.
4
For
Example, Three:
I. When disclosing
Criminal Records for purposes such as Employment, Time Limits known as Spent Convictions come into
play.
|
LIMITATION PERIODS
[Exhibit C]
|
|
1.
|
Class of claim
|
Limitation period
|
|
2.
|
Fraudulent breach of trust
|
None (LA 1980, s.
21(1))
|
|
3.
|
Recovery of land
|
12 years (LA
1980, s. 15(1))
|
|
4.
|
Recovery of money secured by mortgage
|
12 years (LA
1980, s. 20(1))
|
|
5.
|
Speciality
|
12 years (LA
1980, s. 8(1))
|
|
6.
|
Recovery of money due under statute
|
6 years (LA 1980,
s. 9(1))
|
|
7.
|
Enforcement of a judgment
|
6 years (LA 1980,
s. 24(1))
|
|
8.
|
Contract
|
6 years (LA 1980,
s. 5)
|
|
9.
|
Recovery of trust property and breach of trust
|
6 years (LA 1980,
s. 21(3))
|
|
10.
|
Recovery of arrears of rent
|
6 years (LA 1980,
s. 19)
|
|
11.
|
Tort (except those listed below) Note: This includes claims under s. 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act
1967
|
6years (LA 1980,
s. 2)
|
|
12.
|
Defective Premises Ad 1972 (DPA 1972) claims
|
6 years (DPA
1972, s. 1(B))
|
|
13.
|
Personal injury claims
|
3 years (LA 1980,
s. 11(4))
|
|
14.
|
Fatal Accident Act 1976 claims
|
3 years (LA 1980,
s. 12(2)}
|
|
15.
|
Claims under the Consumer Protection Act 1987
|
3 years (LA 1980,
s. 11 A)
|
|
16.
|
Carriage by Air Act 1961 (CAA 1961) claims
|
2 years (CAA
1961, Sched. 1)
|
|
17.
|
Claims for personal injury or damage to vessel,
cargo, or
|
2 years (Merchant
Shipping Act 1995, s. 190(3) and
|
|
18.
|
property at sea
|
Sched. 6)
|
|
19.
|
Disqualification of company directors
|
2 years (Company Directors
Disqualification Act 1986, s. 7(2)}
|
|
20.
|
Contribution under the Civil Liability
(Contribution) Act 1978
|
2 years (LA 1980,
s. 10(1)}
|
|
21.
|
Contributions under the Maritime Conventions
Act 1911
|
1 year (Merchant
Shipping Act 1995, s. 190(4))
|
|
22.
|
Carriage of Goods by Road Act 1965 (CGRA 1965)
|
claims 1 year
(CGRA 1965, Art. 32(1))
|
|
23.
|
Defamation and malicious falsehood
|
1 year (LA 1980,
s.4A)
|
|
24.
|
Applications for judicial review
|
3 months
(CPR54.5)
|
|
25.
|
Unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights
Act 1996 (ERA 1996)
|
3 months (ERA
1996, s. 111(2))
|
|
26.
|
Applications for new business tenancies under
the
|
Not less than 2
months nor more than 4 months (LTA
|
|
27.
|
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954)
|
1954, s. 29(3})
|
|
28.
|
Actions for an account
|
Period applicable
to claim on which account is based (LA 1980, s. 23)
|
|
WHICH LIMITATION PERIOD APPLIES TO AN ACTION?
1)
It is sometimes difficult to decide which
category a particular case may fall. It is possible that the nature of
the claim itself may affect the application of a limitation period. If
the action arises from fraudulent behaviour, the Court will consider whether
it was the fraudulent behaviour of a party or of another. Where the fraud
is that of a person who is not a party, then the defendant will normally
be able to rely on a limitation period applying. But if the fraudulent
behaviour is that of a party, then it is more likely that the Court will
decide that no limitation period applies. Claims that are a mixture of
tort and contract can also cause difficulties.
2)
A full examination of the more complex issues
arising from limitation is outside the scope of this manual, but any
legal representative acting in an action in which 'limitation' issues
raise will need to examine the law applying in detail (see Blackstone's Civil Practice in this
regard).
3) The Court has a discretion to
dis-apply the limitation period in personal injury actions under s. 33 of
the LA 1980. In these
circumstances, the Court will decide whether it would be equitable and whether it would be prejudicial to the defendant,
considering all of the circumstances of the case. There may be good
reasons not to rely on a limitation defence,
where a fair trial can still take place despite the delay. Two recent
cases have considered the application of s. 33 LAin Kara Rayner v Wolfe stans (A firm), Medway NHS Foundation Trust
[2015] EWHC 2957 (QB), the Judge allowed the Now Claimant
to proceed with her personal injury claim seven years after the statutory
period of limitation had expired where the Judge found that the Now
Claimant had been prejudiced by delays not of her making. This case is a
clear example of the Court helping a 'deserving' Now Claimant. In Collins
v Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills [2013] the Court would not exercise
its discretion, as it decided that the evidence was dodgy and unreliable,
and there would be real prejudice to the defendant if the limitation
period did not apply.
Exceptions in the Limitation Act
4)
The
Limitation Act 1980 does
hold exceptions to the rules discussed above. There are two exceptions
that may be relevant to claims against the police. Firstly, time does not
begin to run against a minor until he or she reaches the age of eighteen.
Thus, if the alleged police misconduct occurred during the Now Claimant's
childhood the applicable limitation period would not start to run until
he or she reached adulthood. Yes
5)
Secondly,
the running of the proper limitation period faces delays where any fact
relevant to the Now Claimant's right of action is concealed deliberately
from him or her by the defendant. In these circumstances the period runs
from the time when the Now Claimant discovers the concealment or from the
point when he or she could have discovered it by using reasonable
diligence. A deliberate breach of duty in circumstances where it is
unlikely discovered for time amounts to deliberate concealment for these
purposes. Deliberate concealment therefore covers intentional wrongdoing
that, by its nature, is unlikely to be discovered for a considerable
period of time, if the wrongdoer does nothing to draw it to the Now
Claimant's attention.71 Accordingly, this concept could cover police
misconduct that was not readily apparent to the Now Claimant at the time
but emerges subsequently, for example if; officers pressurised
or induced a third party falsely to incriminate the Now Claimant. In this
instance the Now Claimant would know from the outset that the testimony
incriminating him or her was false, but he or she would not necessarily
appreciate that this stemmed from improper police behaviour. The
deliberate concealment must relate to a fact that forms part of the 'right
of action, as opposed to those which simply strengthen an existing case.
So, it would be difficult for the Now Claimant to obtain an advantage
from this statutory provision in a false imprisonment claim, as the cause
of action is complete when the detention occurs and any subsequently
discovered facts would bolster an existing claim, rather than create a
fresh cause of action. In contrast, in a malicious Prosecution claim, a
lack of reasonable and probable cause for the Prosecution and malice on
the part of the wrongdoer are intrinsic elements of the cause of action;
thus, subsequent discovered police misconduct relating to those issues
may well to facts relevant to the right of action, so that the running
limitation period is postponed until they came to light.
Human Rights Act claims
6)
The
limitation period for bringing proceedings against a public authority
under the Human Rights Act 1998
is short. Proceedings brought must be before the end of one year
beginning with the date on which the act complained of took place.
However, there is provision for a longer period if the Court or tribunal
considers it equitable having regard to all the circumstances. The
one-year period is subject to any rule imposing a stricter time limit in
relation to the procedure in question. Thus, for example, a judicial
review application which relied upon breaches of the Human Rights Act 1998 would be subject to the usual
three-month time period applicable to such claims.8" However, where
a person does not bring proceedings against a public authority but merely
seeks to rely on his or her rights under the European Convention of Human
Rights in relation to legal proceedings brought by others, no limitation
period is imposed by the Human Rights Act 1998.S1
Discrimination claims
7)
The
time limit for bringing proceedings under the Race Relations Act 1976 is within six months less one
day from the date of the act complained of It is possible to obtain a
two-month extension when a claim to the Commission exists for Racial
Equality for help within the six-month period. The Commission can grant a
further months extension if it is considering the application. The
six-month period for bringing a claim does not begin to run until the
conclusion of an act extending over a period'. The Court has a
discretion to extend the time limit for bringing discrimination claims
where it considers it just and equitable to do so. Similar limitation
provisions apply in relation to discrimination on the grounds of sex and
disability.
8)
There
may be instances where the same facts give rise to different limitation
periods. For example, if a person is stopped and searched in a manner
which gives rise to a potential claim under the Race Relations Act 1976 and is then prosecuted, but the
proceedings are not concluded until more than six months after the
initial incident, consideration should be given to issuing proceedings in
the county Court under the Act and then staying these proceedings pending
the outcome of the criminal case. The priority for the potential Now
Claimant may well be to secure an acquittal on the criminal case and he
or she may not wish to aggravate the police or CPS by alerting them to a
potential race case. In these circumstances it is open to the adviser to
issue proceedings within the initial six-month period, but to delay
serving them until the conclusion of the criminal matter.
Persons under disabilities
9)
Where the Now Claimant is a person under a
disability, being either a child or a protected party ' (see paragraphs
7.3.1 and 7.3.2), the limitation period does not start to run until:
--
- if a child, from the date of the
child's 18th birthday.
- if a protected party, if they were
of unsound mind at the time of the cause of action or the unsound
mind was caused by the cause of action, from the date on which they
are no longer of unsound mind (whenever that may be medically
certified). If the person was of sound mind at the time of the
cause of action, the limitation period will continue to run.
Fraud, concealment, and
mistake
10) In claims based on fraud, the
limitation period does not begin to run until the Now Claimant discovers
(or could, with reasonable diligence, have discovered) the fraud. The
limitation period will also not run whilst the defendant deliberately
conceals a relevant fact. Where the claim is for relief from the
consequences of a mistake, time does not run until the claimant
discovered the mistake or could have discovered it with reasonable
diligence.
Latent damage
11) The Latent Damage Act 1986 created greater fairness in
situations in which the limitation period may expire before a party is
even aware that a claim exists. In claims in tort (other than for
personal injuries), the Latent Damage Act 1986 provides new sections (inserted into the LA 1980, ss. 14A and 14B). The
provisions added to the LA 1980 by
the 1986 Act provide two
periods of limitation: one that is six years from accrual (the usual
period for claims in tort), and another that is three years from the
'starting date'that is, the earliest date at which the Now Claimant knew
that the relevant damage was sufficiently serious to justify proceedings,
enabling a claim to subsist, and when it could be attributed to the act
of negligence and the identity of the defendant.
12) To prevent defendants being
potentially 'at risk' of a claim indefinitely, s. 14B of the LA 1980 provides a long-stop period for
bringing proceedings of 15 years from the act or omission alleged to
constitute the negligence causing the Now Claimant's damage.
The discretionary extension
of limitation periods
- Discretionary
provisions to extend the statutory limitation period apply in:
- judicial
review proceedings the three-month time limit can be extended if
good reasons are shown.
|
|
Whistle Blowing
Officers!
b) Whistle Blowing
officer.
Whistle Blowing
Officers!
a) Whistle
Blowing Officers!
13/ The nominated
Whistle Blowing officer of the Enfield
Council should review the legitimacy of the registered
suspicion and then liaise as necessary with the Directing chain of
command and at
·
When A Whistle
Blowing Officer Receives a Suspicion There Are 3 Step to Follow:
a) No action
necessary, update database, close case and there will be no referral.
b) Referral to the
Assistant Director of CFPS who will appoint an investigator.
c) Further internal
investigation needed this may lead to no action or an investigation.
False
pretence
14/ In the Table at
The Bottom of This Document Below is Exhibit
*****.
·
Physical Evidence
15/ If there is any physical evidence the employee or Manager
should seize this, if possible.
16/ It is essential that this is secure, and a record kept of the
time and place the information was document.
17/ This is all showed in my diary.
·
Collection of
Evidence
18/ If evidence consists of more than one item, for example more
than one document, each one should easily be identifiable with a
reference number corresponding to the written record.
19/ This is all showed in my diary.
·
Witnesses
20/ Case handlers of complaints should talk through the disclosed
information with the witness if right and complete a record kept of any
discussions.
We have added
Additional Whistle Blowing Notes in the following files:
1. New Draft 2024 Si
Notes 16-04-24
|
|
The Right to a Fair Trial
R v Horncastle and others
Exhibit L
·
Principal issue raised by these
appeals are: -
a) whether a
conviction based solely or to a decisive extent on the statement of a
witness whom the defendant has had no chance of cross-examining
necessarily infringes the defendants right to a fair trial under
articles 6(1) and 6(3)(d) which provide:
b) In the Judge s
determination of The Now Claimants civil rights their obligations are of
any criminal charge against him, every persons entitled to a fair and
public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial
tribunal set up by law.
c) Everyone charged
with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: . . .
d) to examine or
have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and
examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as
witnesses against him.
|
|
SPECIAL
CIRCUMSTANCES
D. Understanding Special Circumstances:
1
Special
Circumstances refer to factors that deviate from the ordinary or typical
conditions and can significantly impact a situation. These factors are
unique or exceptional in nature and are considered in various contexts,
such as:
i. Emergency
Situations
ii. Legal
Exceptions
iii. Humanitarian
Considerations
iv. National
Security
v. Medical
Emergencies
vi. Public
Health Crises
vii. Acts of
God
viii. Technological
Advancements
E. Tailored Responses:
1
Special
circumstances typically require tailored responses or considerations,
often involving legal, policy, or administrative adjustments to address
specific challenges.
REMOVING
SPENT CONVICTIONS
😊
F.
The Removal of
Spent Convictions 😊
1
In the United Kingdom, there are
specific circumstances under which time-spent cases can be erased or
expunged from an individual's criminal record. Here are some potential
scenarios for having cases removed from an ACRO report in the UK:
i. Wrongful
Conviction: If an individual
was wrongfully convicted and subsequently exonerated through new
evidence, the wrongful conviction should be removed from the ACRO report.
ii. The Right to Rehabilitation: a. The Rehabilitation of Offenders
Act 1974: This act in the UK allows certain convictions to become
"spent" after a specified period, which means they no longer
need to be disclosed.
iii. The
Right to Erasure:
In terms of data storage or
archiving, the UKs Data Protection Act 2018 and the General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR) provide individuals with a right to request
the deletion or removal of personal data where there is no compelling
reason for its continued processing.
This
includes data related to spent convictions.
However, the process may
not be automatic and individuals may need to
make a formal request.
2
Understanding
Spent Convictions:
A spent conviction is a criminal record that, after a certain period of
time, becomes legally 'spent' and doesn't need to be disclosed in most
circumstances. The idea behind spent convictions is to give individuals
who have made mistakes in the past a second chance, allowing them to
reintegrate into society without the burden of a criminal record.
3
Rehabilitation
Period: The rehabilitation period
varies depending on the nature and severity of the offense. In the UK,
the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 dictates when a conviction
becomes spent. For example, a conviction resulting in a prison sentence
of 4 years or more will never become spent. For shorter sentences, the
rehabilitation period may be shorter. During the rehabilitation period,
the individual must demonstrate good behaviour and not commit any further
offenses.
4
Removal of Spent
Convictions from an ACRO Report: ACRO is an
organization that maintains the Police National Computer (PNC), which
holds criminal record information. ACRO reports are often used for
background checks by employers, visa applications, and other purposes.
Once a conviction becomes spent according to the legal framework, there
is generally no obligation to disclose it, and it can be removed from the
ACRO report. However, the process of removal may not happen
automatically. The individual may need to apply for the removal of spent
convictions from their ACRO report.
i. Applying
for Removal: The process for
applying for the Removal of Spent Convictions from an ACRO report
typically involves submitting an application to ACRO or the Disclosure
and Barring Service (DBS) in the UK. The applicant needs to provide
details of the conviction, including dates, location, and case numbers,
and may need to pay a fee. ACRO or DBS will review the application,
verify the spent status of the conviction, and, if eligible, remove it
from the report.
ii. Exceptions: Certain professions and roles,
such as working with vulnerable individuals or in law enforcement, may
require individuals to disclose spent convictions. Spent convictions
might not be removed from an ACRO report if they fall under these
exceptions.
iii. Impact
on Individuals:
The removal of spent convictions from an ACRO report can be crucial for
individuals seeking employment, housing, or visas, as it allows them to
move forward without the stigma of a past offense. It supports the
principles of rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
5
Youth Offenses: For cases involving offenses
committed by individuals under the age of 18, there are provisions in the
law to have these records sealed or become spent after a certain number
of years, depending on the severity of the offense.
6
Non-Conviction
Records: Cases marked as
"NFA" (No Further Action) or "Not Guilty" should
typically be removed from the ACRO report, as they indicate that no
conviction occurred.
7
Pardons: If an individual receives a
pardon or a royal prerogative of mercy, the associated convictions can be
removed from the ACRO report.
8
Human Rights
Violations: Cases that, if
retained, would constitute a violation of an individual's human rights or
cases that could lead to unjust discrimination, may be eligible for
removal.
9
Data Protection
Laws: The UK's Data
Protection Act and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provide
individuals with rights to request the erasure of their personal data in
certain situations, which can include the removal of old or irrelevant
criminal records.
10 Record
Expungement Laws: The
UK may introduce specific laws or policies regarding the expungement or
removal of certain types of convictions.
11 Protection
of Vulnerable Groups (PVG) Scheme: In Scotland, certain convictions
can be removed from an individual's PVG Scheme record if they meet
specific criteria.
|
Pre
Copilot Chat with Bing
|
|
Yes, the information you provided is
correct and I can provide some updates based on the latest changes in
the law.
The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (ROA) in
the UK dictates when a conviction becomes spent1. The rehabilitation periods
depend on the sentence given or disposal administered as a result of a
conviction and the age of the individual on the date they are convicted1.
As of 28 October 2023, the government
legislation has updated the rehabilitation periods1. For example, a custodial
sentence of more than 4 years (not for a schedule 18 offence) becomes spent at the end
of the period of 7 years beginning with the day on which the sentence
(including any licence period) is completed1.
However,
certain sentences are excluded from rehabilitation and will always be disclosed1. These include sentences of: --
imprisonment for life, sentences of imprisonment, youth custody,
detention in a young offender institution or corrective training of
over four years for a
schedule 18 offence, sentences of preventive detention,
sentences of detention at His Majestys pleasure, sentences of custody
for life, and public protection sentences1.
The process for applying for the
removal of spent convictions typically involves submitting an
application to ACRO or the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) in the
UK2. The applicant needs to provide
details of the conviction, including dates, location, and case numbers,
and may need to pay a fee2. ACRO or DBS will review the
application, verify the spent status of the conviction, and, if
eligible, remove it from the report2.
Certain professions and roles,
such as working with vulnerable individuals or in law enforcement, may
require individuals to disclose spent convictions2. Spent convictions might not be
removed from an ACRO report if they fall under these exceptions2.
The removal of spent convictions
from an ACRO report can be crucial for individuals seeking employment,
housing, or visas, as it allows them to move forward without the stigma
of a past offense2. It supports the principles of
rehabilitation and reintegration into society2.
For cases involving offenses
committed by individuals under the age of 18, there are provisions in
the law to have these records sealed or become spent after a certain
number of years, depending on the severity of the offense2.
Cases marked as NFA (No
Further Action) or Not Guilty should typically be removed from the
ACRO report, as they indicate that no conviction occurred2.
If an individual receives a
pardon or a royal prerogative of mercy, the associated convictions can
be removed from the ACRO report2.
Cases that, if retained, would
constitute a violation of an individuals human rights or cases that
could lead to unjust discrimination, may be eligible for removal2.
The UKs Data Protection Act and
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provide individuals with
rights to request the erasure of their personal data in certain
situations, which can include the removal of old or irrelevant criminal
records2.
The UK may introduce specific
laws or policies regarding the expungement or removal of certain types
of convictions2.
In Scotland, certain convictions
can be removed from an individuals PVG Scheme record if they meet
specific criteria2.
Sure,
I can provide a timestamp for our conversation. The conversation
started on Thursday,
16 November 2023 at 18:06:27 GMT. P
what is a complete
explanation of all UK schedule 18 offences
Schedule 18 of the Sentencing
Act 2020 in the UK lists specified offences for the purposes of
section 30612. These offences are categorized
into three parts: violent
offences, sexual
offences, and terrorism
offences1.
Heres a
brief explanation of how these offences are treated:
For a
complete list of offences under Schedule 18, you can refer to the Sentencing Act 2020 on the UK Legislation website. Please
note that this is a complex legal document and may require legal
expertise to fully understand. If you need legal advice, please consult
a legal professional.
For the Councils & Other Removals of Data
Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),
individuals have the right to request the deletion or removal of
personal data where there is no compelling reason for its continued
processing and this includes data
related to spent convictions.
Heres a
brief overview of the process:
- Recognizing a Request:
The first step is to recognize when a request for erasure has been
made. This can be done verbally or in writing1.
- Responding
to the Request: Once a
request has been made, the organization has one month to respond1. They must also have
processes in place to ensure that they respond to a request for
erasure without undue delay1.
- Evaluating
the Request: The
right to erasure is not absolute and only applies in certain
circumstances1. For example, individuals
have the right to have their personal data erased if the personal
data is no longer necessary for the purpose which it was
originally collected or processed for1.
- Executing the Erasure:
If the request is valid, the organization must erase the personal
data. They should have
appropriate methods in place to erase information1.
- Informing
Others: If the organization has
shared the personal data with others, they must inform them about
the erasure of the personal data1.
Please note
that this is a general guideline and the
actual process may vary depending on the specific circumstances of each
case. Always consult with a legal professional for advice tailored to
your specific circumstances.
|
|
|
|